These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22497962)

  • 1. Highly effective and inexpensive parasitological technique for diagnosis of intestinal parasites in developing countries: spontaneous sedimentation technique in tube.
    Tello R; Terashima A; Marcos LA; Machicado J; Canales M; Gotuzzo E
    Int J Infect Dis; 2012 Jun; 16(6):e414-6. PubMed ID: 22497962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Spontaneous sedimentation in tube technique (SSTT) for diagnosis of intestinal parasites].
    Terashima A; Marcos L; Maco V; Canales M; Samalvides F; Tello R
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2009; 29(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 20066014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of "Parasep filter fecal concentrator tubes" for the detection of intestinal parasites in stool samples under routine conditions.
    Zeeshan M; Zafar A; Saeed Z; Irfan S; Sobani ZA; Shakoor S; Beg MA
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2011; 54(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 21393892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between spontaneous sedimentation method and Paratest® for the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections.
    Brandelli CL; Cargnin ST; Willers DM; Oliveira KR; Tasca T
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2011 Oct; 105(10):604-6. PubMed ID: 21742360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Concordance between the zinc sulphate flotation and centrifugal sedimentation methods for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites].
    Inês EJ; Pacheco FT; Pinto MC; Mendes PS; Da Costa-Ribeiro H; Soares NM; Teixeira MC
    Biomedica; 2016 Dec; 36(4):519-524. PubMed ID: 27992978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing the Efficiency of Spontaneous Sedimentation for the Diagnosis of Intestinal Protozoa.
    Raso CNDS; Millar PR; Brener B; de Mattos DPBG; Leles D; Fonseca ABM; Sudré AP
    J Parasitol; 2019 Apr; 105(2):248-251. PubMed ID: 30921523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Parasitic fecal analyses. Prescription, application and interpretation of results].
    Rispail P; Jarry DM
    Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol (Paris); 1993; 29(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 8239491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic methods for intestinal parasites in southern Iraq with reference to Strongyloides stercoralis.
    Mahdi NK; Setrak SK; Shiwaish SM
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1993 Dec; 24(4):685-91. PubMed ID: 7939941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The comparison of the concentration techniques used in investigation of feces for parasitosis].
    Cöplü N; Gözalan A; Akin L
    Turkiye Parazitol Derg; 2007; 31(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 17594653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The need for three stool specimens in routine laboratory examinations for intestinal parasites.
    Nazer H; Greer W; Donnelly K; Mohamed AE; Yaish H; Kagalwalla A; Pavillard R
    Br J Clin Pract; 1993; 47(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 8334067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of the usefulness of the Coprotest for parasitologic examination of feces].
    Amato Neto V; Campos R; Pinto PL; Matsubara L; Braz LM; Miyamoto A; Foster R; do Nascimento SA; de Souza HB; Moreira AA
    Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo; 1989; 44(4):153-5. PubMed ID: 2623406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Current trends in parasitological diagnosis].
    Marti H; Bordmann G; Weiss N
    Ther Umsch; 1990 Oct; 47(10):827-32. PubMed ID: 2260023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of PCR-based methods for diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections in the clinical laboratory.
    Verweij JJ
    Parasitology; 2014 Dec; 141(14):1863-72. PubMed ID: 24780241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the quantitative formalin ethyl acetate concentration technique and agar plate culture for diagnosis of human strongyloidiasis.
    Intapan PM; Maleewong W; Wongsaroj T; Singthong S; Morakote N
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 43(4):1932-3. PubMed ID: 15815023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of five techniques for the diagnosis of canine gastrointestinal parasites.
    Coelho WM; Gomes JF; Falcão AX; dos Santos BM; Soares FA; Suzuki CT; do Amarante AF; Bresciani KD
    Rev Bras Parasitol Vet; 2015; 24(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 26154964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Triple Faeces Test: an effective tool for detection of intestinal parasites in routine clinical practice.
    van Gool T; Weijts R; Lommerse E; Mank TG
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2003 May; 22(5):284-90. PubMed ID: 12736794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Examination of feces for the detection of parasites. A comparison of 2 methods].
    McClure E; García A; Trujillo J; Bawden M
    Rev Med Panama; 1984 Sep; 9(3):226-9. PubMed ID: 6494506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A historical review of the techniques of recovery of parasites for their detection in human stools.
    Soares FA; Benitez ADN; Santos BMD; Loiola SHN; Rosa SL; Nagata WB; Inácio SV; Suzuki CTN; Bresciani KDS; Falcão AX; Gomes JF
    Rev Soc Bras Med Trop; 2020; 53():e20190535. PubMed ID: 32491097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Newer diagnostic approaches to intestinal protozoa.
    van Lieshout L; Verweij JJ
    Curr Opin Infect Dis; 2010 Oct; 23(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 20683263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the direct faecal smear and two thick smear techniques for the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections.
    Engels D; Nahimana S; Gryseels B
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 1996; 90(5):523-5. PubMed ID: 8944262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.