297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22498312)
1. Microbubble-induced sonoporation involved in ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection in vitro at low acoustic pressures.
Qiu Y; Zhang C; Tu J; Zhang D
J Biomech; 2012 May; 45(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 22498312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The correlation between acoustic cavitation and sonoporation involved in ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection with polyethylenimine (PEI) in vitro.
Qiu Y; Luo Y; Zhang Y; Cui W; Zhang D; Wu J; Zhang J; Tu J
J Control Release; 2010 Jul; 145(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20398711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of cell membrane response to ultrasound activated microbubbles.
Tran TA; Le Guennec JY; Bougnoux P; Tranquart F; Bouakaz A
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jan; 55(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 18334312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of sonoporation effect of liposomes and phospholipids-based microbubbles on cultured cell membrane].
Zhao YZ; Luo YK; Tang J; Zhang Y; Lin Q; Mei XG
Yao Xue Xue Bao; 2006 Dec; 41(12):1176-9. PubMed ID: 17290616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The improvement of liposome-mediated transfection of pEGFP DNA into human prostate cancer cells by combining low-frequency and low-energy ultrasound with microbubbles.
Bai WK; Wu ZH; Shen E; Zhang JZ; Hu B
Oncol Rep; 2012 Feb; 27(2):475-80. PubMed ID: 22020492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability.
Karshafian R; Bevan PD; Williams R; Samac S; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):847-60. PubMed ID: 19110370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simple method for quantifying ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction.
Hung SH; Yeh CK; Tsai TH; Chen T; Chen RC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):949-57. PubMed ID: 21546152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative relations of acoustic inertial cavitation with sonoporation and cell viability.
Lai CY; Wu CH; Chen CC; Li PC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1931-41. PubMed ID: 17169705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancement effect of ultrasound-induced microbubble cavitation on branched polyethylenimine-mediated VEGF(165) transfection with varied N/P ratio.
Zhang CB; Cao HL; Li Q; Tu J; Guo X; Liu Z; Zhang D
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Jan; 39(1):161-71. PubMed ID: 23141903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental study on cell self-sealing during sonoporation.
Yang F; Gu N; Chen D; Xi X; Zhang D; Li Y; Wu J
J Control Release; 2008 Nov; 131(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 18727944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Membrane perforation and recovery dynamics in microbubble-mediated sonoporation.
Hu Y; Wan JM; Yu AC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2393-405. PubMed ID: 24063956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A model to calculate microstreaming-shear stress generated by oscillating microbubbles on the cell membrane in sonoporation.
Yu H; Chen S
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(1):861-8. PubMed ID: 24211973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increasing the sonoporation efficiency of targeted polydisperse microbubble populations using chirp excitation.
McLaughlan J; Ingram N; Smith PR; Harput S; Coletta PL; Evans S; Freear S
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Dec; 60(12):2511-20. PubMed ID: 24297017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biophysical insight into mechanisms of sonoporation.
Helfield B; Chen X; Watkins SC; Villanueva FS
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Sep; 113(36):9983-8. PubMed ID: 27551081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound and microbubble-targeted delivery of small interfering RNA into primary endothelial cells is more effective than delivery of plasmid DNA.
Juffermans LJ; Meijering BD; Henning RH; Deelman LE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):532-40. PubMed ID: 24361223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound-mediated microbubble destruction enhances gene transfection in pancreatic cancer cells.
Wang JF; Wang JB; Chen H; Zhang CM; Liu L; Pan SH; Wu CJ
Adv Ther; 2008 May; 25(5):412-21. PubMed ID: 18463802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microbubble attenuation and destruction: are they involved in sonoporation efficiency?
Escoffre JM; Novell A; Piron J; Zeghimi A; Doinikov A; Bouakaz A
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 23287912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Targeted gene delivery to the synovial pannus in antigen-induced arthritis by ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction in vivo.
Xiang X; Tang Y; Leng Q; Zhang L; Qiu L
Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():304-14. PubMed ID: 26433434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of transfection efficiency in skeletal muscle using nano/microbubbles and ultrasound.
Kodama T; Aoi A; Watanabe Y; Horie S; Kodama M; Li L; Chen R; Teramoto N; Morikawa H; Mori S; Fukumoto M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1196-205. PubMed ID: 20620706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficient Gene Delivery by Sonoporation Is Associated with Microbubble Entry into Cells and the Clathrin-Dependent Endocytosis Pathway.
Delalande A; Leduc C; Midoux P; Postema M; Pichon C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1913-26. PubMed ID: 25929996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
