These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22498429)
1. Decisions about lumping vs. splitting of the scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions are not well justified: a case study in systematic reviews of health care professional reminders. Weir MC; Grimshaw JM; Mayhew A; Fergusson D J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):756-63. PubMed ID: 22498429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts. Montori VM; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB; BMC Med; 2003 Nov; 1():2. PubMed ID: 14633274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated? French SD; McDonald S; McKenzie JE; Green SE BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16225692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect? Allen D; Rixson L Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations. Manchikanti L Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them. Chan KS; Morton SC; Shekelle PG Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):806-12. PubMed ID: 15623270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The evidence for nursing interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Mistiaen P; Poot E; Hickox S; Wagner C Nurse Res; 2004; 12(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 15636007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. Jadad AR; Cook DJ; Browman GP CMAJ; 1997 May; 156(10):1411-6. PubMed ID: 9164400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. Atkins D; Chang SM; Gartlehner G; Buckley DI; Whitlock EP; Berliner E; Matchar D J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1198-207. PubMed ID: 21463926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews. Lawson ML; Pham B; Klassen TP; Moher D J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 16018912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review. Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Neonatal neurology decision-making starting from systematic reviews of Cochrane Collaboration]. González de Dios J Rev Neurol; 2005 Apr 16-30; 40(8):453-9. PubMed ID: 15861325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strategies for improving the quality of health care in maternal and child health in low- and middle-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews. Althabe F; Bergel E; Cafferata ML; Gibbons L; Ciapponi A; Alemán A; Colantonio L; Palacios AR Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 22 Suppl 1():42-60. PubMed ID: 18237352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using evidence in pain practice: Part II: Interpreting and applying systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. Chou R Pain Med; 2008; 9(5):531-41. PubMed ID: 18346061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Promoting development and use of systematic reviews in a developing country. Yousefi-Nooraie R; Rashidian A; Nedjat S; Majdzadeh R; Mortaz-Hedjri S; Etemadi A; Salmasian H J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1029-34. PubMed ID: 20367702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making. Kranke P Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement? Lui S; Smith EJ; Terplan M Acupunct Med; 2010 Sep; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 20615852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment. de Craen AJ; van Vliet HA; Helmerhorst FM J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 15718121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Usefulness of Cochrane Skin Group reviews for clinical practice. Davila-Seijo P; Batalla A; Garcia-Doval I Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2013 Oct; 104(8):679-84. PubMed ID: 23954044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]