153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22498798)
1. Visual acuity testability and comparability in Australian preschool children: the Sydney Paediatric Eye Disease Study.
Leone JF; Gole GA; Mitchell P; Kifley A; Pai AS; Rose KA
Eye (Lond); 2012 Jul; 26(7):925-32. PubMed ID: 22498798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Normative visual acuity in infants and preschool-aged children in Sydney.
Leone JF; Mitchell P; Kifley A; Rose KA;
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 92(7):e521-9. PubMed ID: 24606232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual acuity testability in African-American and Hispanic children: the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study.
Cotter SA; Tarczy-Hornoch K; Wang Y; Azen SP; Dilauro A; Borchert M; Varma R;
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 144(5):663-7. PubMed ID: 17868633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Visual Acuity Results Between ATS-HOTV and E-ETDRS Testing Methods in Children With Optic Pathway Gliomas.
Avery RA; Go C; Fisher MJ; Liu GT; Garcia A; Richter M; McGeehan B; Quinn GE; Ying GS
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Mar; 11(3):10. PubMed ID: 35262649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should tumbling E go out of date in amblyopia screening? Evidence from a population-based sample normative in children aged 3-4 years.
Guimaraes S; Fernandes T; Costa P; Silva E
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 102(6):761-766. PubMed ID: 28988161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and the electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in amblyopic children aged 5 to 11 years.
Birch EE; Strauber SF; Beck RW; Holmes JM;
J AAPOS; 2009 Feb; 13(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 18848480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preschool visual acuity screening with HOTV and Lea symbols: testability and between-test agreement.
Vision in Preschoolers Study Group
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 81(9):678-83. PubMed ID: 15365387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Threshold visual acuity testing of preschool children using the crowded HOTV and Lea Symbols acuity tests.
Cyert L; Schmidt P; Maguire M; Moore B; Dobson V; Quinn G;
J AAPOS; 2003 Dec; 7(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 14730291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the HOTV and Lea Symbols charts for preschool vision screening.
Hered RW; Murphy S; Clancy M
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1997; 34(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9027676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy and agreement between visual acuity charts for detecting significant refractive errors in preschoolers.
Thomas J; Rajashekar B; Kamath A; Gogate P
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 May; 103(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 31566805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High rate of failed visual-acuity measurements with the Amsterdam Picture Chart in screening at the age of 36 months.
Telleman MAJ; Sloot F; Benjamins J; Simonsz HJ
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 97(1):24-28. PubMed ID: 30284395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lack of concordance between fixation preference and HOTV optotype visual acuity in preschool children: the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study.
Friedman DS; Katz J; Repka MX; Giordano L; Ibironke J; Hawse P; Tielsch JM
Ophthalmology; 2008 Oct; 115(10):1796-9. PubMed ID: 18538405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testability of refraction, stereopsis, and other ocular measures in preschool children: the Sydney Paediatric Eye Disease Study.
Pai AS; Rose KA; Samarawickrama C; Fotedar R; Burlutsky G; Varma R; Mitchell P
J AAPOS; 2012 Apr; 16(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 22525178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome.
Ravikumar A; Benoit JS; Morrison KB; Marsack JD; Anderson HA
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Mar; 95(3):202-211. PubMed ID: 29461409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of age using Lea Symbols or HOTV for preschool vision screening.
Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group
Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Feb; 87(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 19996814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.
Schmidt P; Maguire M; Dobson V; Quinn G; Ciner E; Cyert L; Kulp MT; Moore B; Orel-Bixler D; Redford M; Ying GS;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Apr; 111(4):637-50. PubMed ID: 15051194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of performance of certified medical assistants in preschool vision screening examination.
Adhikari S; Shrestha U
Nepal J Ophthalmol; 2011; 3(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 21876585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Semistructured Observation of Population-based Eye Screening in The Netherlands.
Sloot F; Sami A; Karaman H; Gutter M; Benjamins J; Sjoerdsma T; Simonsz HJ
Strabismus; 2017 Dec; 25(4):214-221. PubMed ID: 29182469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
