These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22499699)

  • 41. Ascertainment correction for Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis of a quantitative trait.
    Ma J; Amos CI; Warwick Daw E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 31(6):594-604. PubMed ID: 17487893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of genotype-by-sex interaction on quantitative trait linkage analysis.
    Towne B; Siervogel RM; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1053-8. PubMed ID: 9433623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Inference of relationships in population data using identity-by-descent and identity-by-state.
    Stevens EL; Heckenberg G; Roberson ED; Baugher JD; Downey TJ; Pevsner J
    PLoS Genet; 2011 Sep; 7(9):e1002287. PubMed ID: 21966277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effect of pedigree complexity on quantitative trait linkage analysis.
    Dyer TD; Blangero J; Williams JT; Göring HH; Mahaney MC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S236-43. PubMed ID: 11793675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Adequacy of single-locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits: extension to multigenerational pedigree structures.
    Vieland VJ; Greenberg DA; Hodge SE
    Hum Hered; 1993; 43(6):329-36. PubMed ID: 8288263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Close linkage to chromosome 3p and conservation of ancestral founding haplotype in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families.
    Nyström-Lahti M; Sistonen P; Mecklin JP; Pylkkänen L; Aaltonen LA; Järvinen H; Weissenbach J; de la Chapelle A; Peltomäki P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1994 Jun; 91(13):6054-8. PubMed ID: 8016114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Monte Carlo methods for linkage analysis of two-locus disease models.
    Lin S
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 Nov; 64(Pt 6):519-32. PubMed ID: 11281216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Parameter estimation and quantitative parametric linkage analysis with GENEHUNTER-QMOD.
    Künzel T; Strauch K
    Hum Hered; 2012; 73(4):208-19. PubMed ID: 22948723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Two-trait-locus linkage analysis: a powerful strategy for mapping complex genetic traits.
    Schork NJ; Boehnke M; Terwilliger JD; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Nov; 53(5):1127-36. PubMed ID: 8213836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Empirical significance values for linkage analysis: trait simulation using posterior model distributions from MCMC oligogenic segregation analysis.
    Igo RP; Wijsman EM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 32(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 17849492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Maximum-likelihood estimation of recent shared ancestry (ERSA).
    Huff CD; Witherspoon DJ; Simonson TS; Xing J; Watkins WS; Zhang Y; Tuohy TM; Neklason DW; Burt RW; Guthery SL; Woodward SR; Jorde LB
    Genome Res; 2011 May; 21(5):768-74. PubMed ID: 21324875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Joint segregation and linkage analysis of a quantitative trait compared to separate analyses.
    Gauderman WJ; Faucett CL; Morrison JL; Carpenter CL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):993-8. PubMed ID: 9433613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Test of association for quantitative traits in general pedigrees: the quantitative pedigree disequilibrium test.
    Zhang S; Zhang K; Li J; Sun F; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S370-5. PubMed ID: 11793701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A new method of linkage analysis using LOD scores for quantitative traits supports linkage of monoamine oxidase activity to D17S250 in the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism pedigrees.
    Curtis D; Knight J; Sham PC
    Psychiatr Genet; 2005 Sep; 15(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 16094252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pedigree generation for analysis of genetic linkage and association.
    Bass MP; Martin ER; Hauser ER
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2004; ():93-103. PubMed ID: 14992495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Introduction of the IBD information into the weighted pairwise correlation method for linkage analysis.
    Zinn-Justin A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(1):35-50. PubMed ID: 10323183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. General derivation of the sets of pedigrees with the same kinship coefficients.
    Pinto N; Silva PV; Amorim A
    Hum Hered; 2010; 70(3):194-204. PubMed ID: 20720433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Identity-by-descent graphs offer a flexible framework for imputation and both linkage and association analyses.
    Blue EM; Cheung CY; Glazner CG; Conomos MP; Lewis SM; Sverdlov S; Thornton T; Wijsman EM
    BMC Proc; 2014; 8(Suppl 1 Genetic Analysis Workshop 18Vanessa Olmo):S19. PubMed ID: 25519371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Distinguishing pedigree relationships via multi-way identity by descent sharing and sex-specific genetic maps.
    Qiao Y; Sannerud JG; Basu-Roy S; Hayward C; Williams AL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Jan; 108(1):68-83. PubMed ID: 33385324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impact of family structure on the power of linkage tests using sib-pair methods.
    Goddard KA; Goode EL; Rozek LS; Jarvik GP
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S575-9. PubMed ID: 10597495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.