112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22499728)
1. Evaluating a new marker for risk prediction using the test tradeoff: an update.
Baker SG; Van Calster B; Steyerberg EW
Int J Biostat; 2012 Mar; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 22499728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating a new marker for risk prediction: decision analysis to the rescue.
Baker SG; Kramer BS
Discov Med; 2012 Sep; 14(76):181-8. PubMed ID: 23021372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating Risk Prediction with Data Collection Costs: Novel Estimation of Test Tradeoff Curves.
Baker SG
Med Decis Making; 2024 Jan; 44(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 37990924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cut-off estimation and medical decision making based on a continuous prognostic factor: the prediction of kidney graft failure.
Foucher Y; Giral M; Soulillou JP; Daurès JP
Int J Biostat; 2012 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 22499724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of bias in MoM values on patient risk and screening performance for Down syndrome.
Nix B; Wright D; Baker A
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Sep; 27(9):840-5. PubMed ID: 17600858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive value and efficiency of hematology data.
Galen RS
Blood Cells; 1980; 6(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 6769520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker.
Moons KG; Kengne AP; Woodward M; Royston P; Vergouwe Y; Altman DG; Grobbee DE
Heart; 2012 May; 98(9):683-90. PubMed ID: 22397945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ROC curves with multiple marker measurements.
Murtaugh PA
Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1514-22. PubMed ID: 8589236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calibration of risk prediction models: impact on decision-analytic performance.
Van Calster B; Vickers AJ
Med Decis Making; 2015 Feb; 35(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25155798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.
Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB; D'Agostino RB; Vasan RS
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):157-72; discussion 207-12. PubMed ID: 17569110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 1. ROC plots showed no added value above the AUC when evaluating the performance of clinical prediction models.
Verbakel JY; Steyerberg EW; Uno H; De Cock B; Wynants L; Collins GS; Van Calster B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():207-216. PubMed ID: 32712176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using the weighted area under the net benefit curve for decision curve analysis.
Talluri R; Shete S
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jul; 16():94. PubMed ID: 27431531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simple Decision-Analytic Functions of the AUC for Ruling Out a Risk Prediction Model and an Added Predictor.
Baker SG
Med Decis Making; 2018 Feb; 38(2):225-234. PubMed ID: 29025299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semiparametric estimation of time-dependent ROC curves for longitudinal marker data.
Zheng Y; Heagerty PJ
Biostatistics; 2004 Oct; 5(4):615-32. PubMed ID: 15475423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using treatment-tradeoff preferences to select diagnostic strategies: linking the ROC curve to threshold analysis.
DeNeef P; Kent DL
Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 8483397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How to interpret a small increase in AUC with an additional risk prediction marker: decision analysis comes through.
Baker SG; Schuit E; Steyerberg EW; Pencina MJ; Vickers A; Moons KG; Mol BW; Lindeman KS
Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(22):3946-59. PubMed ID: 24825728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationships among performance measures in the selection of diagnostic tests.
Einstein AJ; Bodian CA; Gil J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Feb; 121(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 9126035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvement of cardiovascular risk prediction: time to review current knowledge, debates, and fundamentals on how to assess test characteristics.
Romanens M; Ackermann F; Spence JD; Darioli R; Rodondi N; Corti R; Noll G; Schwenkglenks M; Pencina M
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2010 Feb; 17(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 19952758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefit adequacy among elderly Social Security retired-worker beneficiaries and the SSI federal benefit rate.
Rupp K; Strand A; Davies P; Sears J
Soc Secur Bull; 2007; 67(3):29-51. PubMed ID: 18605217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Performance measures for prediction models and markers: evaluation of predictions and classifications].
Steyerberg EW; Van Calster B; Pencina MJ
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):788-94. PubMed ID: 21763052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
