These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22499731)

  • 1. Meta-analysis of observational studies with unmeasured confounders.
    McCandless LC
    Int J Biostat; 2012 Jan; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 22499731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy A
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(11):2331-47. PubMed ID: 16998821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hierarchical priors for bias parameters in Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy AR; Richardson S
    Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(4):383-96. PubMed ID: 22253142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the impact of unmeasured confounding with internal validation data: an example cost evaluation in type 2 diabetes.
    Faries D; Peng X; Pawaskar M; Price K; Stamey JD; Seaman JW
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 23538177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
    Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A sensitivity analysis using information about measured confounders yielded improved uncertainty assessments for unmeasured confounding.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 18226747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations.
    Chiba Y
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prior event rate ratio adjustment: numerical studies of a statistical method to address unrecognized confounding in observational studies.
    Yu M; Xie D; Wang X; Weiner MG; Tannen RL
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 May; 21 Suppl 2():60-8. PubMed ID: 22552981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oral contraceptive use and cardiovascular disease: is the relationship real or due to study bias?
    Katerndahl DA; Realini JP; Cohen PA
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Aug; 35(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 1386621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian modelling of lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure adjusted for unmeasured confounding by smoking.
    de Vocht F; Kromhout H; Ferro G; Boffetta P; Burstyn I
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Aug; 66(8):502-8. PubMed ID: 19060029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies.
    Lin DY; Psaty BM; Kronmal RA
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):948-63. PubMed ID: 9750244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of Bayesian and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P
    Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(18):2887-2901. PubMed ID: 28386994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oral contraceptives and breast cancer. A meta-analysis.
    Delgado-Rodriguez M; Sillero-Arenas M; Rodriguez-Contreras R; López Gigosos R; Gàlvez Vargas R
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1991; 39(2):165-81. PubMed ID: 1830968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Large-sample Bayesian posterior distributions for probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
    Hazen GB; Huang M
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(5):512-34. PubMed ID: 16997928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis and Bayesian analysis of smoking as an unmeasured confounder in a study of silica and lung cancer.
    Steenland K; Greenland S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 160(4):384-92. PubMed ID: 15286024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new strategy for meta-analysis of continuous covariates in observational studies.
    Sauerbrei W; Royston P
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3341-60. PubMed ID: 21953493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases.
    Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 1996 Dec; 25(6):1107-16. PubMed ID: 9027513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.