These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
50. Tensile bond strength of polyvinyl siloxane impressions bonded to a custom tray as a function of drying time: Part I. Cho GC; Donovan TE; Chee WW; White SN J Prosthet Dent; 1995 May; 73(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 7658389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A new type ceramic bracket for suppression of resin remaining in debonding. Kinami H; Sugimura M; Sakuda M; Okazaki M; Kimura H J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1990 Dec; 30():106-14. PubMed ID: 2130164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods. Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement]. Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A comparison of the shear-peel and third-order bond strengths of orthodontic brackets with 2 etch techniques and the role of bracket asymmetry. Gibb AJ; Katona TR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):699.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17169729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A build-up impression technique for the edentulous mandible using various viscosities of silicone impression material. Fitzgerald M J Ir Dent Assoc; 2014; 60(3):122-5. PubMed ID: 25080637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Maximizing the benefits of resin-modified glass ionomer orthodontic adhesives. Gallant B J Gen Orthod; 1999; 10(2):22-6. PubMed ID: 10535035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Bonding fiber-reinforced lingual retainers with color-reactivating flowable composite. Geserick M; Ball J; Wichelhaus A J Clin Orthod; 2004 Oct; 38(10):560-2. PubMed ID: 15548842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Long-term experience with direct-bonded retainers: update and clinical advice. Zachrisson BU J Clin Orthod; 2007 Dec; 41(12):728-37; quiz 749. PubMed ID: 18192755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The use of a flowable ormocer for bonding brackets. Vicente A; Bravo LA Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):292-4. PubMed ID: 17993024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]