These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22501036)

  • 1. Binaural temporal fine structure sensitivity, cognitive function, and spatial speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners (L).
    Neher T; Lunner T; Hopkins K; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2561-4. PubMed ID: 22501036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss.
    Baltzell LS; Swaminathan J; Cho AY; Lavandier M; Best V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Mar; 147(3):1546. PubMed ID: 32237845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of recovered envelope cues in the identification of temporal-fine-structure speech for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Léger AC; Desloge JG; Braida LD; Swaminathan J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):505-8. PubMed ID: 25618081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH; Stecker GC
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory and Cognitive Factors Associated with Speech-in-Noise Complaints following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Hoover EC; Souza PE; Gallun FJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Apr; 28(4):325-339. PubMed ID: 28418327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of age and cochlear hearing loss on temporal fine structure sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise.
    Hopkins K; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):334-49. PubMed ID: 21786903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on visually guided attention in a multitalker environment.
    Best V; Marrone N; Mason CR; Kidd G; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Mar; 10(1):142-9. PubMed ID: 19009321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of non-spatial factors on measures of spatial release from masking.
    Best V; Marrone N; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):3103-10. PubMed ID: 22501083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive abilities relate to self-reported hearing disability.
    Zekveld AA; George EL; Houtgast T; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1364-72. PubMed ID: 23838985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech.
    Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1140-53. PubMed ID: 18247914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.
    Ernst SMA; Kortlang S; Grimm G; Bisitz T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29373937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.
    Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH; Roush PA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.