These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22501080)

  • 1. Talker-identification training using simulations of binaurally combined electric and acoustic hearing: generalization to speech and emotion recognition.
    Krull V; Luo X; Iler Kirk K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):3069-78. PubMed ID: 22501080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Talker variability effects on vocal emotion recognition in acoustic and simulated electric hearing.
    Luo X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):EL497. PubMed ID: 28040001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of Emotional Prosody Identification by School-Age Children With Cochlear Implants and Their Peers With Normal Hearing.
    Chatterjee M; Gajre S; Kulkarni AM; Barrett KC; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):411-424. PubMed ID: 37811966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.
    Ritter C; Vongpaisal T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804966. PubMed ID: 30378469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With Varied Asymmetric Hearing: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Speech Recognition, Localization, and Participant Report.
    Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK; Dwyer NY;
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):845-862. PubMed ID: 29373326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.
    Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.
    Sheffield BM; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):518-30. PubMed ID: 22280613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of carrier bandwidth on integration of simulations of acoustic and electric hearing within or across ears.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Dec; 142(6):EL561. PubMed ID: 29289073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandarin speech perception in combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Li Y; Zhang G; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112471. PubMed ID: 25386962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Talker intelligibility differences in cochlear implant listeners.
    Green T; Katiri S; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):EL223-9. PubMed ID: 17552573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
    Yang HI; Zeng FG
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.
    Liu YW; Tao DD; Chen B; Cheng X; Shu Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1316-1327. PubMed ID: 30882534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vibro-Tactile Enhancement of Speech Intelligibility in Multi-talker Noise for Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.
    Fletcher MD; Mills SR; Goehring T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518797838. PubMed ID: 30222089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
    Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of speaking rate on recognition of synthetic and natural speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Ji C; Galvin JJ; Xu A; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 23238527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.