These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22501083)

  • 61. Better-ear glimpsing at low frequencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Rana B; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1192. PubMed ID: 27586748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Release from masking for small spatial separations: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Srinivasan NK; Jakien KM; Gallun FJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):EL73. PubMed ID: 27475216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker.
    Calandruccio L; Van Engen K; Dhar S; Bradlow AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1458-71. PubMed ID: 20689024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Speech Masking in Normal and Impaired Hearing: Interactions Between Frequency Selectivity and Inherent Temporal Fluctuations in Noise.
    Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():125-132. PubMed ID: 27080653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):342-59. PubMed ID: 20649229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Spatial Release From Informational Masking: Evidence From Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy.
    Zhang M; Mary Ying YL; Ihlefeld A
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518817464. PubMed ID: 30558491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA; Fortune TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Effect of audibility on better-ear glimpsing as a function of frequency in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Rana B; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2195. PubMed ID: 29716302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
    Christiansen C; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Speech perception with music maskers by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Eskridge EN; Galvin JJ; Aronoff JM; Li T; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):800-10. PubMed ID: 22223890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Measure Hearing Aid Benefit.
    Kuk F; Seper E; Lau CC; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):698-707. PubMed ID: 28906241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Acoustic hemifields in the spatial release from masking of speech by noise.
    Phillips DP; Vigneault-MacLean BK; Boehnke SE; Hall SE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Nov; 14(9):518-24. PubMed ID: 14708840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
    Kilman L; Zekveld A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Localization in speech mixtures by listeners with hearing loss.
    Best V; Carlile S; Kopco N; van Schaik A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):EL210-15. PubMed ID: 21568377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.