198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22501084)
1. Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
Kwon BJ; Perry TT; Wilhelm CL; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):3111-9. PubMed ID: 22501084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Masking release and modulation interference in cochlear implant and simulation listeners.
Jin SH; Nie Y; Nelson P
Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 23800809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comodulation masking release in speech identification with real and simulated cochlear-implant hearing.
Ihlefeld A; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Carlyon RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1315-24. PubMed ID: 22352505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
Croghan NBH; Smith ZM
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
Stickney GS; Zeng FG; Litovsky R; Assmann P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.
Jin SH; Nelson PB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3097-108. PubMed ID: 16708964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.
Fu QJ; Nogaki G
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 15735937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Nelson PB; Jin SH; Carney AE; Nelson DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):961-8. PubMed ID: 12597189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.
Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH; Roush PA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.
Zhou N; Dong L; Dixon S
Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 389():107921. PubMed ID: 32097828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.
Gregan MJ; Nelson PB; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2895-912. PubMed ID: 24116426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence for independent time-unit processing of speech using noise promoting or suppressing masking release (L).
Healy EW; Youngdahl CL; Apoux F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):581-4. PubMed ID: 25234867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Nelson PB; Jin SH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech perception with music maskers by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Eskridge EN; Galvin JJ; Aronoff JM; Li T; Fu QJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):800-10. PubMed ID: 22223890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
Jones JA; Freyman RL
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception.
Lorenzi C; Husson M; Ardoint M; Debruille X
Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):487-95. PubMed ID: 17005491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
Ihlefeld A; Litovsky RY
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulations of cochlear-implant speech perception in modulated and unmodulated noise.
Ihlefeld A; Deeks JM; Axon PR; Carlyon RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):870-80. PubMed ID: 20707456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
