269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22503576)
1. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance?
Weiss BE; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22503576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Lee JS; Chung BH
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy.
Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of PSA density by 3 imaging modalities and its correlation with the PSA density of radical prostatectomy specimen.
Varkarakis I; Zarkadoulias A; Bourdoumis A; Chatzidarellis E; Antoniou N; Deliveliotis C
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1038-42. PubMed ID: 22196747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy to monitor the prostate for residual disease or local cancer recurrence after transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound.
Cirillo S; Petracchini M; D'Urso L; Dellamonica P; Illing R; Regge D; Muto G
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 18476973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate imaging may not be necessary in nonpalpable carcinoma of the prostate.
Werner-Wasik M; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Corn BW; Arger P; Reisinger S; Langlotz C; Alexander A; D'Amico AV; Hyslop T; Gomella L; Brownstein K; Wein AJ
Urology; 1997 Sep; 50(3):385-9. PubMed ID: 9301702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Limited value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer.
May F; Treumann T; Dettmar P; Hartung R; Breul J
BJU Int; 2001 Jan; 87(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 11121995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
Goris Gbenou MC; Peltier A; Addla SK; Lemort M; Bollens R; Larsimont D; Roumeguère T; Schulman CC; van Velthoven R
Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22004874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal and abdominal echography and its implication for the measurement of the PSA density for the diagnosis of prostate cancer].
Rodríguez-Patrón Rodríguez R; Mayayo Dehesa T; Lennie Zucharino A; González Galán A
Arch Esp Urol; 2002 Sep; 55(7):797-806. PubMed ID: 12380308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of transrectal ultrasonography and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma.
Ekici S; Ozen H; Ağildere M; Ergen A; Ozkardeş H; Ayhan A; Kendi S
BJU Int; 1999 May; 83(7):796-800. PubMed ID: 10368199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Significance of endorectal nuclear magnetic resonance tomography and transrectal ultrasound diagnosis in local staging of prostatic carcinoma].
May F; Treumann T; Dettmar P; Hartung R; Breul J
Urologe A; 2002 Sep; 41(5):458-61. PubMed ID: 12426863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate volume measurement by TRUS using heights obtained by transaxial and midsagittal scanning: comparison with specimen volume following radical prostatectomy.
Park SB; Kim JK; Choi SH; Noh HN; Ji EK; Cho KS
Korean J Radiol; 2000; 1(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 11752939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate volumetric assessment by magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound: impact of variation in calculated prostate-specific antigen density on patient eligibility for active surveillance program.
Dianat SS; Rancier Ruiz RM; Bonekamp D; Carter HB; Macura KJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(4):589-95. PubMed ID: 23863537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (CE-TRUS) with cadence-contrast pulse sequence (CPS) technology for the identification of prostate cancer.
Seitz M; Gratzke C; Schlenker B; Buchner A; Karl A; Roosen A; Singer BB; Bastian PJ; Ergün S; Stief CG; Reich O; Tilki D
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 19523857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of prostate volume measured by endorectal coil MRI to prostate specimen volume and mass after radical prostatectomy.
Mazaheri Y; Goldman DA; Di Paolo PL; Akin O; Hricak H
Acad Radiol; 2015 May; 22(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 25708867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of CT scan to transrectal ultrasound-measured prostate volume in untreated prostate cancer.
Hoffelt SC; Marshall LM; Garzotto M; Hung A; Holland J; Beer TM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Sep; 57(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 12909212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and multicoil magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer.
Sanchez-Chapado M; Angulo JC; Ibarburen C; Aguado F; Ruiz A; Viaño J; García-Segura JM; Gonzalez-Esteban J; Rodriquez-Vallejo JM
Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 9286643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Preoperative endorectal MRI in prostate cancer: a monocentric retrospective cohort].
de Vendin C; Eydant Y; Ecochard R; Lorin S; Lacroix B; Lardon R; Mottet N
Prog Urol; 2013 Dec; 23(16):1412-8. PubMed ID: 24274946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancer volume estimations based on transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy in order to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.
Konyalioglu E; Tarhan H; Cakmak O; Pala EE; Zorlu F
Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 26200537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three-dimensional (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml.
Kumar V; Jagannathan NR; Kumar R; Thulkar S; Gupta SD; Hemal AK; Gupta NP
NMR Biomed; 2007 Feb; 20(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 16894640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
