BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22503966)

  • 1. Resistance to change varies inversely with reinforcement context.
    Grace RC; Arantes J; Berg ME
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22503966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response elimination, reinforcement rate and resurgence of operant behavior.
    Cançado CR; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2013 Nov; 100():91-102. PubMed ID: 23954832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
    Reed P; Yoshino T
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential resurgence and response elimination.
    Doughty AH; da Silva SP; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 17395402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrafreeloading, reinforcement rate, and behavioral momentum.
    Podlesnik CA; Jimenez-Gomez C
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jul; 128():24-8. PubMed ID: 27045696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tests of behavior momentum in simple and multiple schedules with rats and pigeons.
    Cohen SL; Riley DS; Weigle PA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Sep; 60(2):255-91. PubMed ID: 8409822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behavioral momentum: the effects of the temporal separation of rates of reinforcement.
    Cohen SL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):29-47. PubMed ID: 9465412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pausing as an operant: choice and discriminated responding.
    Craig AR; Lattal KA; Hall EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 24436113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Briefly delayed reinforcement effects on variable-ratio and yoked-interval schedule performance.
    Holtyn AF; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 23900853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extinguished operant responding shows stimulus specificity.
    McSweeney FK; Murphy ES; Kowal BP
    Behav Processes; 2004 Mar; 65(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 14998658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability of responding on a concurrent schedule as a function of body weight.
    McSweeney FK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Mar; 21(2):357-9. PubMed ID: 4815398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of variable-interval value and amount of training on stimulus generalization.
    Walker DJ; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Sep; 70(2):139-63. PubMed ID: 9768505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Oscillations following periodic reinforcement.
    Monteiro T; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 18992793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An application of the active time model to multiple concurrent variable-interval schedules.
    Brown EK; Cleaveland JM
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 19038316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.
    Stagner JP; Laude JR; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pigeons learn signal-food intervals independently in a multiple peak procedure.
    Rice N; Grace RC; Kyonka EG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Apr; 40(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 24364669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Super-resurgence: ABA renewal increases resurgence.
    Kincaid SL; Lattal KA; Spence J
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():70-3. PubMed ID: 25712040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unsignaled delay of reinforcement, relative time, and resistance to change.
    Shahan TA; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 May; 83(3):201-19. PubMed ID: 16047606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of signaling reinforcement on resistance to change in a multiple schedule.
    Bell MC; Seip KM; Fitzsimmons KS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jan; 74(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 17071019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The relation between resistance to change and preference in pigeons with concurrent chained schedules].
    Igaki T; Sakagami T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2001 Jun; 72(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 11544912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.