These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22503966)

  • 21. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?
    Nevin JA; Tota ME; Torquato RD; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 2341820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of reinforcement history on responding under progressive-ratio schedules of reinforcement.
    Cohen SL; Pedersen J; Kinney GG; Myers J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):375-87. PubMed ID: 8207352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Johansen EB; Sagvolden T; Kvande G
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15922066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing preference and resistance to change in constant- and variable-duration schedule components.
    Grace RC; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Sep; 74(2):165-88. PubMed ID: 11029021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of the response-reinforcer relation in delay-of-reinforcement effects.
    Williams AM; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 10220929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Drugs and punished responding VI: body weight as a determinant of drug effects.
    McMillan DE
    Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol; 1976 Jan; 13(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1257591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Variable-interval reinforcement schedule value influences responding following REM sleep deprivation.
    Kirby M; Kennedy CH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Sep; 80(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 14674732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Satiation causes within-session decreases in instrumental responding.
    Bizo LA; Bogdanov SV; Killeen PR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1998 Oct; 24(4):439-52. PubMed ID: 9805790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Signals, resistance to change, and conditioned reinforcement in a multiple schedule.
    Bell MC; Gomez BE; Kessler K
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 18355988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of changeover delay on response allocation during probe tests.
    McDevitt MA; Bell MC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 24019008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Drug effects on responding maintained by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer contingencies.
    Spealman RD; Katz JL; Witkin JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Sep; 30(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 702026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multiple schedules, off-baseline reinforcement shifts, and resistance to extinction.
    Craig AR; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):148-163. PubMed ID: 29293265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of baseline reinforcement rate on operant ABA and ABC renewal.
    Berry MS; Sweeney MM; Odum AL
    Behav Processes; 2014 Oct; 108():87-93. PubMed ID: 25241305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Concurrent schedules: undermatching and control by previous experimental conditions.
    Davison MC; Hunter IW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Sep; 32(2):233-44. PubMed ID: 501273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of d-amphetamine on behavior maintained by signaled and unsignaled delays to reinforcement.
    Thomas LD; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 19429220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Choice with frequently changing food rates and food ratios.
    Baum WM; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):246-74. PubMed ID: 24403110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Discrete-trial vs. continuous free-operant procedures in assessing whether reinforcement context affects reinforcement value.
    McDevitt MA; Bell MC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):376-83. PubMed ID: 18054442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of a single free food presentation on extinction responding in a multiple schedule.
    Reiss AJ; Bell MC
    Behav Processes; 2016 Sep; 130():46-52. PubMed ID: 27423967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Resistance to change and relapse of observing.
    Thrailkill EA; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 May; 97(3):281-304. PubMed ID: 22693359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.