These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22503966)

  • 41. Companion's effects upon resistance to change.
    dos Santos CV; Abreu-Rodrigues J
    Behav Processes; 2008 Oct; 79(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 18632224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Investigating retrospective influences on induction in rats' responding for 1% sucrose when food-pellet reinforcement is upcoming.
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 16475670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Extinction as discrimination: the molar view.
    Baum WM
    Behav Processes; 2012 May; 90(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 22425783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Satiation, capacity, and within-session responding.
    DeMarse TB; Killeen PR; Baker D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Nov; 72(3):407-23. PubMed ID: 10605104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice.
    Mazur JE; Snyderman M; Coe D
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Oct; 11(4):565-75. PubMed ID: 4067510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Experience with dynamic reinforcement rates decreases resistance to extinction.
    Craig AR; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Mar; 105(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 26813330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Baseline response rates affect resistance to change.
    Kuroda T; Cook JE; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):164-175. PubMed ID: 29094367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Resistance to extinction, generalization decrement, and conditioned reinforcement.
    Dulaney AE; Bell MC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 18243577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Nov; 80(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 14964707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Catania AC; Reynolds GS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):Suppl:327-83. PubMed ID: 5672248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Conditioned reinforcement value and resistance to change.
    Shahan TA; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 May; 89(3):263-98. PubMed ID: 18540215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The relation between response rates and reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule.
    Pliskoff SS; Shull RL; Gollub LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 5660708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Basic and translational evaluation of renewal of operant responding.
    Kelley ME; Liddon CJ; Ribeiro A; Greif AE; Podlesnik CA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):390-401. PubMed ID: 25891414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Within-subject testing of the signaled-reinforcement effect on operant responding as measured by response rate and resistance to change.
    Reed P; Doughty AH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jan; 83(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15762379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Resurgence without overall worsening of alternative reinforcement.
    Nighbor TD; Oliver AC; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2020 Oct; 179():104219. PubMed ID: 32777262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Hunger and contrast in a multiple schedule.
    Herrnstein RJ; Loveland DH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 May; 21(3):511-7. PubMed ID: 4838198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Training reinforcement rates, resistance to extinction, and the role of context in reinstatement.
    Miranda-Dukoski L; Bensemann J; Podlesnik CA
    Learn Behav; 2016 Mar; 44(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 26139290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Within-session patterns in variable-interval schedule performance: Variation with deprivation level.
    Pinkston JW; Saulsgiver K; Branch MN
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jul; 75(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 17446011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The relation of multiple-schedule behavioral contrast to deprivation, time in session, and within-session changes in responding.
    McSweeney FK; Swindell S; Murphy ES; Kowal BP
    Learn Behav; 2004 May; 32(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 15281391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.