These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22506783)

  • 1. Distractor inhibition: principles of operation during selective attention.
    Wyatt N; Machado L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):245-56. PubMed ID: 22506783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention?
    Munneke J; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18589391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identity-based inhibitory processing during focused attention.
    Machado L; Guiney H; Struthers P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):138-59. PubMed ID: 22928521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facilitation and inhibition effects in visual selective attention processes of individuals with and without mental retardation.
    Cha KH; Merrill EC
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 Mar; 98(5):594-600. PubMed ID: 8192905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Priming of Pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention.
    Lamy D; Antebi C; Aviani N; Carmel T
    Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 18054983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recently inhibited responses are avoided for both masked and nonmasked primes in a spatial negative priming task.
    Fitzgeorge L; Buckolz E; Khan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1435-52. PubMed ID: 21479723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early and late modulation of saccade deviations by target distractor similarity.
    Mulckhuyse M; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Sep; 102(3):1451-8. PubMed ID: 19553494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition.
    Hay JL; Milders MM; Sahraie A; Niedeggen M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):885-907. PubMed ID: 16846286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysing the relationship between target-to-target and distractor-to-target repetitions: evidence for a common mechanism.
    Frings C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1641-9. PubMed ID: 18609398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibiting change: effects of memory on auditory selective attention.
    Melara RD; Chen S; Wang H
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):431-42. PubMed ID: 16157478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Top-down attentional control for distractor locations: the benefit of precuing distractor locations on target localization and discrimination.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):303-16. PubMed ID: 20364920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulation of saccadic inhibition by distractor size and location.
    Buonocore A; McIntosh RD
    Vision Res; 2012 Sep; 69():32-41. PubMed ID: 22842403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-related effects in inter-trial inhibition of attention.
    Wan X; Voss M; Lleras A
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2011 Sep; 18(5):562-76. PubMed ID: 21756189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The spatial and temporal shape of oculomotor inhibition.
    McSorley E; Haggard P; Walker R
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 19948108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distractor devaluation effect in the attentional blink: direct evidence for distractor inhibition.
    Kihara K; Yagi Y; Takeda Y; Kawahara JI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):168-79. PubMed ID: 20731524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
    Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Specifying the distractor inhibition account of attention-induced motion blindness.
    Hesselmann G; Niedeggen M; Sahraie A; Milders M
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1048-56. PubMed ID: 16309728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociations between identity and location negative priming.
    Chao HF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 21075358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.