These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22506861)

  • 21. The prioritization of perceptual processing in categorization.
    Guest D; Lamberts K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1079-96. PubMed ID: 20436202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Unsupervised categorization and category learning.
    Pothos EM; Chater N
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 May; 58(4):733-52. PubMed ID: 16104104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence for an age-independent process in category learning.
    Livingston KR; Andrews JK
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15985065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recency effects as a window to generalization: separating decisional and perceptual sequential effects in category learning.
    Jones M; Love BC; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):316-32. PubMed ID: 16569149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Goal relevance and artificial grammar learning.
    Eitam B; Schul Y; Hassin RR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):228-38. PubMed ID: 19058050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization.
    Blair MR; Watson MR; Walshe RC; Maj F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1196-206. PubMed ID: 19686015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.
    Minda JP; Smith JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):775-99. PubMed ID: 11394680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Focal putamen lesions impair learning in rule-based, but not information-integration categorization tasks.
    Ell SW; Marchant NL; Ivry RB
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1737-51. PubMed ID: 16635498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Working memory does not dissociate between different perceptual categorization tasks.
    Lewandowsky S; Yang LX; Newell BR; Kalish ML
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):881-904. PubMed ID: 22746954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Errors, efficiency, and the interplay between attention and category learning.
    Blair MR; Watson MR; Meier KM
    Cognition; 2009 Aug; 112(2):330-6. PubMed ID: 19481733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: II. Strategic information search in humans (Homo sapiens) but not in pigeons (Columba livia).
    Lea SE; Wills AJ; Leaver LA; Ryan CM; Bryant CM; Millar L
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):406-20. PubMed ID: 19929109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The nature and processes of preverbal learning: implications from nine-month-old infants' discrimination problem solving.
    Coldren JT; Colombo J
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1994; 59(4):1-75; discussion 76-93. PubMed ID: 7997251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Classifying partial exemplars: seeing less and learning more.
    Taylor EG; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1374-80. PubMed ID: 19686031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual dimensions influence auditory category learning.
    Roark CL; Holt LL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):912-926. PubMed ID: 30761504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Children and adults learn family-resemblance categories analytically.
    Ward TB; Vela E; Hass SD
    Child Dev; 1990 Jun; 61(3):593-605. PubMed ID: 2364735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Category invention in unsupervised learning.
    Clapper JP; Bower GH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Mar; 20(2):443-460. PubMed ID: 8151279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Natural categorization through multiple feature learning in pigeons.
    Huber L; Troje NF; Loidolt M; Aust U; Grass D
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Nov; 53(4):341-57. PubMed ID: 11131790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can semi-supervised learning explain incorrect beliefs about categories?
    Kalish CW; Rogers TT; Lang J; Zhu X
    Cognition; 2011 Jul; 120(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 21474122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.
    Jee BD; Wiley J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1786-807. PubMed ID: 24320007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.