These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22507182)

  • 1. Examining the orthopaedic examiners: reliability of the Part 2 Orthopaedic Clinical Fellowship Examination in Australia.
    Cundy P
    ANZ J Surg; 2012 Sep; 82(9):607-11. PubMed ID: 22507182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does Changing Examiner Stations During UK Postgraduate Surgery Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Influence Examination Reliability and Candidates' Scores?
    Brennan PA; Croke DT; Reed M; Smith L; Munro E; Foulkes J; Arnett R
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 26923102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter-examiner agreement in clinical evaluation.
    Reubenson A; Schnepf T; Waller R; Edmondston S
    Clin Teach; 2012 Apr; 9(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 22405367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fellowship exit examination in orthopaedic surgery in the commonwealth countries of Australia, UK, South Africa and Canada. Are they comparable and equivalent? A perspective on the requirements for medical migration.
    Hohmann E; Tetsworth K
    Med Educ Online; 2018 Dec; 23(1):1537429. PubMed ID: 30372402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary FRSC (Eng). I. Evaluation of assessment techniques.
    Hobsley M
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1974 Oct; 55(4):161-8. PubMed ID: 4417893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development, validation and initial outcomes of a questionnaire to examine human factors in postgraduate surgical objective structured clinical examinations.
    Brennan PA; Konieczny K; Groves J; Parker M; Sherman KP; Foulkes J; Hills S; Featherstone C
    Br J Surg; 2015 Mar; 102(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 25644529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of the final fellowship examination.
    Panting A; Black R
    ANZ J Surg; 2009 Mar; 79(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 19317784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interevaluator reliability of a mock paramedic practical examination.
    Martin M; Hubble MW; Hollis M; Richards ME
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2012; 16(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 22229924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oral assessment and postgraduate medical examinations: establishing conditions for validity, reliability and fairness.
    Memon MA; Joughin GR; Memon B
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 May; 15(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 18386152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reliability of the College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand "Hot Case" examination.
    Hoffman KR; Swanson D; Lane S; Nickson C; Brand P; Ryan AT
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 May; 24(1):527. PubMed ID: 38734603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency ('hawk-dove effect') in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling.
    McManus IC; Thompson M; Mollon J
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Aug; 6():42. PubMed ID: 16919156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systems-based practice assessed with a performance-based examination simulated and scored by standardized participants in the health care system: feasibility and psychometric properties.
    Hingle ST; Robinson S; Colliver JA; Rosher RB; McCann-Stone N
    Teach Learn Med; 2011 Apr; 23(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 21516602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter-rater reliability in clinical assessments: do examiner pairings influence candidate ratings?
    Faherty A; Counihan T; Kropmans T; Finn Y
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 May; 20(1):147. PubMed ID: 32393228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An electronic orthopaedic in-training examination.
    Marsh JL; Hruska L; Mevis H
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2010 Oct; 18(10):589-96. PubMed ID: 20889948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How should paediatric examiners be trained?
    Khera N; Davies H; Davies H; Lissauer T; Skuse D; Wakeford R; Stroobant J
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Jan; 90(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 15613510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The consistency and uncertainty in examiners' definitions of pass/fail performance on OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) stations.
    Rothman AI; Blackmore D; Cohen R; Reznick R
    Eval Health Prof; 1996 Mar; 19(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 10186899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interexaminer agreement on the American Board of Emergency Medicine oral certification examination.
    Bianchi L; Gallagher EJ; Korte R; Ham HP
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jun; 41(6):859-64. PubMed ID: 12764343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing the accredited postgraduate assessment program for Fellowship of the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine.
    Smith JD; Prideaux D; Wolfe CL; Wilkinson TJ; Sen Gupta T; DeWitt DE; Worley P; Hays RB; Cowie M
    Rural Remote Health; 2007; 7(4):805. PubMed ID: 17953499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of the Part II Board Certification Examination in Psychiatry: interexaminer consistency.
    McDermott JF; Tanguay PE; Scheiber SC; Juul D; Shore JH; Tucker GJ; McCurdy L; Terr LC
    Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Dec; 148(12):1672-4. PubMed ID: 1957929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthopaedic trainee operative supervision and experience: South-East Thames Regional orthopaedic operative database 1991-1998.
    Walczak JP; Shaw CJ; Peckham T; Heatley FW
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Sep; 81(5 Suppl):251-5. PubMed ID: 10700753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.