129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22507297)
1. Three dimensional comparative measurement of polyurethane milled skull models based on CT and MRI data sets.
Reinbacher KE; Wallner J; Kärcher H; Pau M; Quehenberger F; Feichtinger M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e419-25. PubMed ID: 22507297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy of 3-dimensional magnetic resonance 3D vibe images of the mandible: an in vitro comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.
Goto TK; Nishida S; Nakamura Y; Tokumori K; Nakamura Y; Kobayashi K; Yoshida Y; Yoshiura K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Apr; 103(4):550-9. PubMed ID: 17395071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional computer-aided surgical simulation for maxillofacial surgery.
Xia JJ; Gateno J; Teichgraeber JF
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2005 Mar; 13(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 15820428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Preoperative accuracy of selective laser sintering (SLS) in craniofacial 3D modeling: comparison with patient CT data].
Kaim AH; Kirsch EC; Alder P; Bucher P; Hammer B
Rofo; 2009 Jul; 181(7):644-51. PubMed ID: 19253203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mirror imaging and preshaped titanium plates in the treatment of unilateral malar and zygomatic arch fractures.
Feng F; Wang H; Guan X; Tian W; Jing W; Long J; Tang W; Liu L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 21216634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of new soft tissue software in orthognathic surgery planning.
Marchetti C; Bianchi A; Muyldermans L; Di Martino M; Lancellotti L; Sarti A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21030211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Additive manufacturing models of fetuses built from three-dimensional ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scan data.
Werner H; dos Santos JR; Fontes R; Daltro P; Gasparetto E; Marchiori E; Campbell S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 36(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 20205157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical applications of physical 3D models derived from MDCT data and created by rapid prototyping.
Esses SJ; Berman P; Bloom AI; Sosna J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):W683-8. PubMed ID: 21606254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dimensional accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufactured orbital prostheses.
Marafon PG; Mattos BS; Sabóia AC; Noritomi PY
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 20552095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment prediction with three-dimensional computer tomographic skull models.
Fuhrmann RA; Frohberg U; Diedrich PR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 8059751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Registration of 2D x-ray images to 3D MRI by generating pseudo-CT data.
van der Bom MJ; Pluim JP; Gounis MJ; van de Kraats EB; Sprinkhuizen SM; Timmer J; Homan R; Bartels LW
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):1031-43. PubMed ID: 21258138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stereolithography versus milled three-dimensional models: comparison of production method, indication, and accuracy.
Santler G; Kärcher H; Gaggl A; Kern R
Comput Aided Surg; 1998; 3(5):248-56. PubMed ID: 10207649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of craniofacial measurements: computed tomography and three-dimensional computed tomography compared with stereolithographic models.
Frühwald J; Schicho KA; Figl M; Benesch T; Watzinger F; Kainberger F
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 18216660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT-MR image data fusion for computer-assisted navigated surgery of orbital tumors.
Nemec SF; Peloschek P; Schmook MT; Krestan CR; Hauff W; Matula C; Czerny C
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 19097718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dimensional error of selective laser sintering, three-dimensional printing and PolyJet models in the reproduction of mandibular anatomy.
Ibrahim D; Broilo TL; Heitz C; de Oliveira MG; de Oliveira HW; Nobre SM; Dos Santos Filho JH; Silva DN
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 37(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 19056288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual model surgery and wafer fabrication using 2-dimensional cephalograms, 3-dimensional virtual dental models, and stereolithographic technology.
Choi JY; Hwang JM; Baek SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Feb; 113(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 22677736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of a parallel-beam CCD optical-CT apparatus for 3D radiation dosimetry.
Krstajić N; Doran SJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3693-713. PubMed ID: 17664571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new method to move mandible to intercuspal position in virtual three-dimensional orthognathic surgery by integrating primary occlusion model.
Dai J; Wang X; Hu G; Shen SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):e484-9. PubMed ID: 22907113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Application of three-dimensional reconstruction technique based on CT-MRI fusion in skull base surgery].
Xu TF; Duan WC; Lu T; Chen L
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 47(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 22883578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison between computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and laser scanning for capturing 3-dimensional data from a natural ear to aid rehabilitation.
Coward TJ; Scott BJ; Watson RM; Richards R
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 16479767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
