These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22507724)
1. Evaluation of disinfection of flexible nasendoscopes using Tristel wipes: a prospective single blind study. Tzanidakis K; Choudhury N; Bhat S; Weerasinghe A; Marais J Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2012 Apr; 94(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 22507724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomised, single-blind comparison of high-level disinfectants for flexible nasendoscopes. Hitchcock B; Moynan S; Frampton C; Reuther R; Gilling P; Rowe F J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Nov; 130(11):983-989. PubMed ID: 27669971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sequential cohort study comparing chlorine dioxide wipes with automated washing for decontamination of flexible nasendoscopes. Phua CQ; Mahalingappa Y; Karagama Y J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Aug; 126(8):809-14. PubMed ID: 22804853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of the use of chlorine dioxide (Tristel One-Shot) in an automated washer/disinfector (Medivator) fitted with a chlorine dioxide generator for decontamination of flexible endoscopes. Coates D J Hosp Infect; 2001 May; 48(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 11358471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using Microbiological Sampling to Evaluate the Efficacy of Nasofibroscope Disinfection: The Tristel Trio Wipes System in Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) Endoscopy. Ditommaso S; Giacomuzzi M; Cipriani R; Zaccaria T; Cavallo R; Boggio V; Albera R; Zotti CM Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(22):. PubMed ID: 31752418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Disinfection of rigid nasal endoscopes following in vitro contamination with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae. Bradford BD; Seiberling KA; Park FE; Hiebert JC; Chang DF JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jun; 139(6):574-8. PubMed ID: 23680971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The cost of being clean: A cost analysis of nasopharyngoscope reprocessing techniques. Sowerby LJ; Rudmik L Laryngoscope; 2018 Jan; 128(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 28815686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomised single-blind comparison of the effectiveness of Tristel Fuse (chlorine dioxide) as an office-based fluid soak, with Cidex OPA (ortho-phthaldehyde) using an automated endoscopic reprocessor (AER) as high-level disinfection for flexible cystoscopes. Gilling PJ; Reuther RM; Addidle M; Lockhart MM; Frampton CM; Fraundorfer MR BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112 Suppl 2():69-73. PubMed ID: 24127679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of disinfectant wipes for decontamination of bacteria on patients' environmental and medical equipment surfaces at Siriraj Hospital. Seenama C; Tachasirinugune P; Jintanothaitavorn D; Kachintorn K; Thamlikitkul V J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Feb; 96 Suppl 2():S111-6. PubMed ID: 23590030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Disposable chlorine dioxide wipes for high-level disinfection in the ENT department: A systematic review. Tofanelli M; Capriotti V; Saraniti C; Marcuzzo AV; Boscolo-Rizzo P; Tirelli G Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(3):102415. PubMed ID: 32059828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of occupational exposure to airborne chlorine dioxide of healthcare workers using impregnated wipes during high-level disinfection of non-lumened flexible nasoendoscopes. Chang YB; Lee FY; Goh MM; Lam DK; Tan AB J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Dec; 15(12):818-823. PubMed ID: 30215576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Residual bacterial contamination of rhinoscopes used in ENT consultation after cleaning with a pad impregnated with a disinfectant]. Kutter J; Blanc D; Lang FJ Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 2000; Suppl 125():48S-51S. PubMed ID: 11141939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Manual cleaning and disinfection of flexible endoscopes--an approach to evaluating a combined procedure. Knieler R J Hosp Infect; 2001 Aug; 48 Suppl A():S84-7. PubMed ID: 11759033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Limitations of the efficacy of surface disinfection in the healthcare setting. Williams GJ; Denyer SP; Hosein IK; Hill DW; Maillard JY Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 30(6):570-3. PubMed ID: 19432509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Study on the effectiveness of disinfection with wipes against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and implications for hospital hygiene. Cheng KL; Boost MV; Chung JW Am J Infect Control; 2011 Sep; 39(7):577-80. PubMed ID: 21641084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The development of a new three-step protocol to determine the efficacy of disinfectant wipes on surfaces contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus. Williams GJ; Denyer SP; Hosein IK; Hill DW; Maillard JY J Hosp Infect; 2007 Dec; 67(4):329-35. PubMed ID: 17945392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of chlorin dioxide wipes in disinfecting airway devices contaminated with Covid-19. Albaharna H; Almubiereek H; Almualim M; Bukhamsin R; Abdelfattah A; Buohliqah L Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2023; 13():1061647. PubMed ID: 37033491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes. Bradwell HL; Johnson CW; Lee J; Winnington R; Thill S; Jones RB PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237069. PubMed ID: 32845891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]