273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22507740)
1. Guidelines and pharmacopoeial standards for pharmaceutical impurities: overview and critical assessment.
Snodin DJ; McCrossen SD
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jul; 63(2):298-312. PubMed ID: 22507740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recent developments in the risk assessment of potentially genotoxic impurities in pharmaceutical drug substances.
Humfrey CD
Toxicol Sci; 2007 Nov; 100(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 17656486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Overview of genotoxic impurities in pharmaceutical development.
Bercu JP; Dobo KL; Gocke E; McGovern TJ
Int J Toxicol; 2009; 28(6):468-78. PubMed ID: 19966139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toxicological overview of impurities in pharmaceutical products.
Jacobson-Kram D; McGovern T
Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2007 Jan; 59(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 17188779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative assessment of cumulative carcinogenic risk for multiple genotoxic impurities in a new drug substance.
Bercu JP; Hoffman WP; Lee C; Ness DK
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Aug; 51(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 18550240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Overall impact of the regulatory requirements for genotoxic impurities on the drug development process.
Giordani A; Kobel W; Gally HU
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2011 May; 43(1-2):1-15. PubMed ID: 21420491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In silico approaches to predicting cancer potency for risk assessment of genotoxic impurities in drug substances.
Bercu JP; Morton SM; Deahl JT; Gombar VK; Callis CM; van Lier RB
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010; 57(2-3):300-6. PubMed ID: 20363275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A rationale for determining, testing, and controlling specific impurities in pharmaceuticals that possess potential for genotoxicity.
Müller L; Mauthe RJ; Riley CM; Andino MM; Antonis DD; Beels C; DeGeorge J; De Knaep AG; Ellison D; Fagerland JA; Frank R; Fritschel B; Galloway S; Harpur E; Humfrey CD; Jacks AS; Jagota N; Mackinnon J; Mohan G; Ness DK; O'Donovan MR; Smith MD; Vudathala G; Yotti L
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Apr; 44(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16412543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved in silico prediction of carcinogenic potency (TD50) and the risk specific dose (RSD) adjusted Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) for genotoxic chemicals and pharmaceutical impurities.
Contrera JF
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Feb; 59(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 20933038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of compound-specific acceptable daily intakes for 11 mutagenic carcinogens used in pharmaceutical synthesis.
Ellis P; Kenyon M; Dobo K
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Mar; 65(2):201-13. PubMed ID: 23228434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strategies for the identification, control and determination of genotoxic impurities in drug substances: a pharmaceutical industry perspective.
Raman NV; Prasad AV; Ratnakar Reddy K
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2011 Jun; 55(4):662-7. PubMed ID: 21193280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Eliminating pharmaceutical impurities: Recent advances in detection techniques.
Liu DQ; Sun M; Wu L
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2010; 13(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 21061235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The application of structure-based assessment to support safety and chemistry diligence to manage genotoxic impurities in active pharmaceutical ingredients during drug development.
Dobo KL; Greene N; Cyr MO; Caron S; Ku WW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Apr; 44(3):282-93. PubMed ID: 16464524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of Extractable Elements from Elastomers.
Paskiet D; Kraft C; Tullo E; Hunter J; Zurbriggen D
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2019; 73(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 30030347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impurities in drug substances and drug products: new approaches to quantification and qualification.
Berridge JC
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 1995 Dec; 14(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 8833961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potentially mutagenic impurities: analysis of structural classes and carcinogenic potencies of chemical intermediates in pharmaceutical syntheses supports alternative methods to the default TTC for calculating safe levels of impurities.
Galloway SM; Vijayaraj Reddy M; McGettigan K; Gealy R; Bercu J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Aug; 66(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 23688841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Industrial approaches and consideration of clinical relevance in setting impurity level specification for drug substances and drug products.
Pokar D; Rajput N; Sengupta P
Int J Pharm; 2020 Feb; 576():119018. PubMed ID: 31911117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. International Conference on Harmonisation; guidance on Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for use in the International Conference on Harmonisation Regions; Annex 4C on Microbiological Examination of Nonsterile Products: Acceptance Criteria for Pharmaceutical Preparations and Substances for Pharmaceutical Use General Chapter; availability. Notice.
Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Fed Regist; 2009 Apr; 74(66):15992-3. PubMed ID: 19507323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design and international harmonization of pharmacopoeial standards.
Calam DH
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 1995 Dec; 14(1-2):1-5. PubMed ID: 8833960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the genotoxic and carcinogenic risks of p-nitrophenol when it is present as an impurity in a drug product.
Eichenbaum G; Johnson M; Kirkland D; O'Neill P; Stellar S; Bielawne J; DeWire R; Areia D; Bryant S; Weiner S; Desai-Krieger D; Guzzie-Peck P; Evans DC; Tonelli A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Oct; 55(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 19500632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
