These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22508187)

  • 1. On optimal gene-based analysis of genome scans.
    Bacanu SA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2012 May; 36(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 22508187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of association methods for dense marker data.
    Bacanu SA; Nelson MR; Ehm MG
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 32(8):791-9. PubMed ID: 18551558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using tree-based recursive partitioning methods to group haplotypes for increased power in association studies.
    Yu K; Xu J; Rao DC; Province M
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Sep; 69(Pt 5):577-89. PubMed ID: 16138916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.
    de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D
    Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient multilocus association testing for whole genome association studies using localized haplotype clustering.
    Browning BL; Browning SR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 31(5):365-75. PubMed ID: 17326099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The power of genome-wide association studies of complex disease genes: statistical limitations of indirect approaches using SNP markers.
    Ohashi J; Tokunaga K
    J Hum Genet; 2001; 46(8):478-82. PubMed ID: 11501946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SNPs, haplotypes, and model selection in a candidate gene region: the SIMPle analysis for multilocus data.
    Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):429-41. PubMed ID: 15543635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two adaptive weighting methods to test for rare variant associations in family-based designs.
    Fang S; Sha Q; Zhang S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 36(5):499-507. PubMed ID: 22674630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of six statistics of genetic association regarding their ability to discriminate between causal variants and genetically linked markers.
    Lorenzo Bermejo J; Garcia Perez A; Brandt A; Hemminki K; Matthews AG
    Hum Hered; 2011; 72(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 22025134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What's the best statistic for a simple test of genetic association in a case-control study?
    Kuo CL; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 20025064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing untyped alleles (TUNA)-applications to genome-wide association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):718-27. PubMed ID: 16986160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exhaustive allelic transmission disequilibrium tests as a new approach to genome-wide association studies.
    Lin S; Chakravarti A; Cutler DJ
    Nat Genet; 2004 Nov; 36(11):1181-8. PubMed ID: 15502828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A principal components regression approach to multilocus genetic association studies.
    Wang K; Abbott D
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 32(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 17849491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of genome-wide power of genetic association studies based on empirical data from the HapMap project.
    Nannya Y; Taura K; Kurokawa M; Chiba S; Ogawa S
    Hum Mol Genet; 2007 Oct; 16(20):2494-505. PubMed ID: 17666406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tag SNP selection for association studies.
    Stram DO
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 15372618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bivariate association analysis for quantitative traits using generalized estimation equation.
    Yang F; Tang Z; Deng H
    J Genet Genomics; 2009 Dec; 36(12):733-43. PubMed ID: 20129400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting susceptibility genes in case-control studies using set association.
    Kim S; Zhang K; Sun F
    BMC Genet; 2003 Dec; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9. PubMed ID: 14975077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clustering of haplotypes based on phylogeny: how good a strategy for association testing?
    Bardel C; Darlu P; Génin E
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Feb; 14(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 16306882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of multimarker logistic regression models, with application to a genomewide scan of schizophrenia.
    Wason JM; Dudbridge F
    BMC Genet; 2010 Sep; 11():80. PubMed ID: 20828390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.