These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
486 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22508865)
1. Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. John LK; Loewenstein G; Prelec D Psychol Sci; 2012 May; 23(5):524-32. PubMed ID: 22508865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preparing whistleblowers for reporting research misconduct. Bonito AJ; Titus SL; Greene AM; Amoozegar J; Eicheldinger C; Wright DE Account Res; 2012; 19(5):308-28. PubMed ID: 23009270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Glory days or the lure of scientific misconduct. Knoll E J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11653392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dealing with misconduct in biomedical research: a review of the problems and the proposed methods for improvement. Kumar MN Account Res; 2009 Nov; 16(6):307-30. PubMed ID: 19866380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Resnik DB Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands. Gopalakrishna G; Ter Riet G; Vink G; Stoop I; Wicherts JM; Bouter LM PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263023. PubMed ID: 35171921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Questionable research practices in student final theses - Prevalence, attitudes, and the role of the supervisor's perceived attitudes. Krishna A; Peter SM PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203470. PubMed ID: 30161249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific misconduct: ORI survey is flawed. Teitelbaum SL Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739-40. PubMed ID: 12490917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific misconduct: the state's role has limits. Korn D Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739. PubMed ID: 12490916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientists behaving badly. Martinson BC; Anderson MS; de Vries R Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):737-8. PubMed ID: 15944677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How should a nurse approach truth-telling? A virtue ethics perspective. Hodkinson K Nurs Philos; 2008 Oct; 9(4):248-56. PubMed ID: 18798896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry. Protti M J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Tie funding to research integrity. Titus S; Bosch X Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7305):436-7. PubMed ID: 20651673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Validity of patient self report data in rehabilitation research: identifying circumstances of the patients' completion of questionnaires]. Meyer T; Deck R; Raspe H Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2006 Apr; 45(2):118-27. PubMed ID: 16575718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists. Agnoli F; Wicherts JM; Veldkamp CL; Albiero P; Cubelli R PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172792. PubMed ID: 28296929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The state of social and personality science: Rotten to the core, not so bad, getting better, or getting worse? Motyl M; Demos AP; Carsel TS; Hanson BE; Melton ZJ; Mueller AB; Prims JP; Sun J; Washburn AN; Wong KM; Yantis C; Skitka LJ J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Jul; 113(1):34-58. PubMed ID: 28447837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]