These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22508914)

  • 1. Comparison of mercury and aneroid blood pressure measurements in youth.
    Shah AS; Dolan LM; D'Agostino RB; Standiford D; Davis C; Testaverde L; Pihoker C; Daniels SR; Urbina EM;
    Pediatrics; 2012 May; 129(5):e1205-10. PubMed ID: 22508914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings?
    Canzanello VJ; Jensen PL; Schwartz GL
    Arch Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 161(5):729-31. PubMed ID: 11231706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hidden errors of aneroid sphygmomanometers.
    Waugh JJ; Gupta M; Rushbrook J; Halligan A; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):309-12. PubMed ID: 12488650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of aneroid and oscillometric blood pressure measurements in children.
    Eliasdottir SB; Steinthorsdottir SD; Indridason OS; Palsson R; Edvardsson VO
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2013 Nov; 15(11):776-83. PubMed ID: 24112661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between blood pressure readings using a mercury versus an aneroid sphygmomanometer.
    Farhan K; Naqvi STS; Rizvi SAH; Zafar A; Rawala MS
    Blood Press Monit; 2020 Feb; 25(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 31764009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of Missouri aneroid sphygmomanometer to measure blood pressure in patients with cancer.
    Ferreira KA; Santos AC; Arthur TC; Santos DA; Pereira D; Freitas EO; Fukuda FM; Baia WR
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 95(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 20658091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical validation of aneroid sphygmomanometer.
    Saxena Y; Saxena V; Gupta R
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23734440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can aneroid sphygmomanometers be used at altitude?
    Kametas NA; McAuliffe F; Krampl E; Nicolaides KH; Shennan AH
    J Hum Hypertens; 2006 Jul; 20(7):517-22. PubMed ID: 16617312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a clinical trial setting.
    Ma Y; Temprosa M; Fowler S; Prineas RJ; Montez MG; Brown-Friday J; Carrion-Petersen ML; Whittington T;
    Am J Hypertens; 2009 Mar; 22(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 19057514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Which is More Accurate in Measuring the Blood Pressure? A Digital or an Aneroid Sphygmomanometer.
    Shahbabu B; Dasgupta A; Sarkar K; Sahoo SK
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Mar; 10(3):LC11-4. PubMed ID: 27134902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Calibration and safety of sphygmomanometers in health centers of Murcia].
    Antón JJ; Menárguez JF; Alcántara PA; Díaz MJ; Sánchez MC
    Aten Primaria; 1992 Oct; 10(6):817-20. PubMed ID: 1457703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric BP measurements in children with obesity and their effect on the diagnosis of arterial hypertension.
    Fonseca-Reyes S; Romero-Velarde E; Torres-Gudiño E; Illescas-Zarate D; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM
    Arch Cardiol Mex; 2018; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 28238543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Type and accuracy of sphygmomanometers in primary care: a cross-sectional observational study.
    A'Court C; Stevens R; Sanders S; Ward A; McManus R; Heneghan C
    Br J Gen Pract; 2011 Sep; 61(590):e598-603. PubMed ID: 22152749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Assessment of the Accuracy of Home Blood Pressure Monitors When Used in Device Owners.
    Ringrose JS; Polley G; McLean D; Thompson A; Morales F; Padwal R
    Am J Hypertens; 2017 Jul; 30(7):683-689. PubMed ID: 28430848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
    Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What will replace the mercury sphygmomanometer?
    Pickering TG
    Blood Press Monit; 2003 Feb; 8(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 12604932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blood pressure measurement in epidemiological studies: a comparative analysis of two methods. Data from the EPIC-Potsdam Study. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.
    Kroke A; Fleischhauer W; Mieke S; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Willich SN; Boeing H
    J Hypertens; 1998 Jun; 16(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 9663913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Maxi Stabil 3: validation of an aneroid device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol.
    Reinders A; Jones CR; Cuckson AC; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2003 Apr; 8(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 12819560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.