471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22509005)
1. Evidence of a large-scale mechanosensing mechanism for cellular adaptation to substrate stiffness.
Trichet L; Le Digabel J; Hawkins RJ; Vedula SR; Gupta M; Ribrault C; Hersen P; Voituriez R; Ladoux B
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 May; 109(18):6933-8. PubMed ID: 22509005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Crosstalk between focal adhesions and material mechanical properties governs cell mechanics and functions.
Fusco S; Panzetta V; Embrione V; Netti PA
Acta Biomater; 2015 Sep; 23():63-71. PubMed ID: 26004223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite element analysis of traction force microscopy: influence of cell mechanics, adhesion, and morphology.
Zielinski R; Mihai C; Kniss D; Ghadiali SN
J Biomech Eng; 2013 Jul; 135(7):71009. PubMed ID: 23720059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates.
Solon J; Levental I; Sengupta K; Georges PC; Janmey PA
Biophys J; 2007 Dec; 93(12):4453-61. PubMed ID: 18045965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single cell rigidity sensing: A complex relationship between focal adhesion dynamics and large-scale actin cytoskeleton remodeling.
Gupta M; Doss B; Lim CT; Voituriez R; Ladoux B
Cell Adh Migr; 2016 Sep; 10(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 27050660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A minimal mechanics model for mechanosensing of substrate rigidity gradient in durotaxis.
Marzban B; Yi X; Yuan H
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Jun; 17(3):915-922. PubMed ID: 29354863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Propagation of mechanical stress through the actin cytoskeleton toward focal adhesions: model and experiment.
Paul R; Heil P; Spatz JP; Schwarz US
Biophys J; 2008 Feb; 94(4):1470-82. PubMed ID: 17933882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nanoscale mechanics guides cellular decision making.
Rahil Z; Pedron S; Wang X; Ha T; Harley B; Leckband D
Integr Biol (Camb); 2016 Sep; 8(9):929-35. PubMed ID: 27477049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-time single-cell response to stiffness.
Mitrossilis D; Fouchard J; Pereira D; Postic F; Richert A; Saint-Jean M; Asnacios A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Sep; 107(38):16518-23. PubMed ID: 20823257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional traction forces of Schwann cells on compliant substrates.
López-Fagundo C; Bar-Kochba E; Livi LL; Hoffman-Kim D; Franck C
J R Soc Interface; 2014 Aug; 11(97):20140247. PubMed ID: 24872498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cell response to substrate rigidity is regulated by active and passive cytoskeletal stress.
Doss BL; Pan M; Gupta M; Grenci G; Mège RM; Lim CT; Sheetz MP; Voituriez R; Ladoux B
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(23):12817-12825. PubMed ID: 32444491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Theoretical concepts and models of cellular mechanosensing.
De R; Zemel A; Safran SA
Methods Cell Biol; 2010; 98():143-75. PubMed ID: 20816234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computational modeling of three-dimensional ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration.
Kim MC; Silberberg YR; Abeyaratne R; Kamm RD; Asada HH
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jan; 115(3):E390-E399. PubMed ID: 29295934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical model of cells probing the myosin-II-independent mechanosensing mechanism.
Fang Y; Hu Y; Cheng F; Xin Y
Phys Rev E; 2021 Dec; 104(6-1):064403. PubMed ID: 35030921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fibroblasts probe substrate rigidity with filopodia extensions before occupying an area.
Wong S; Guo WH; Wang YL
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Dec; 111(48):17176-81. PubMed ID: 25404288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Force-driven aggregation of specific bonds on compliant substrates.
Sarvestani AS
J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1961-6. PubMed ID: 23764177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Traction forces exerted by epithelial cell sheets.
Saez A; Anon E; Ghibaudo M; du Roure O; Di Meglio JM; Hersen P; Silberzan P; Buguin A; Ladoux B
J Phys Condens Matter; 2010 May; 22(19):194119. PubMed ID: 21386442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A mechanical model of actin stress fiber formation and substrate elasticity sensing in adherent cells.
Walcott S; Sun SX
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Apr; 107(17):7757-62. PubMed ID: 20385838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In silico CDM model sheds light on force transmission in cell from focal adhesions to nucleus.
Milan JL; Manifacier I; Beussman KM; Han SJ; Sniadecki NJ; About I; Chabrand P
J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2625-2634. PubMed ID: 27298154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Focal adhesions as mechanosensors: the two-spring model.
Schwarz US; Erdmann T; Bischofs IB
Biosystems; 2006; 83(2-3):225-32. PubMed ID: 16236431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
