These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Metapopulation responses to patch connectivity and quality are masked by successional habitat dynamics. Hodgson JA; Moilanen A; Thomas CD Ecology; 2009 Jun; 90(6):1608-19. PubMed ID: 19569375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimum viable metapopulation size, extinction debt, and the conservation of a declining species. Bulman CR; Wilson RJ; Holt AR; Gálvez Bravo L; Early RI; Warren MS; Thomas CD Ecol Appl; 2007 Jul; 17(5):1460-73. PubMed ID: 17708221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extinction Thresholds and Metapopulation Persistence in Dynamic Landscapes. Keymer JE; Marquet PA; Velasco-Hernández JX; Levin SA Am Nat; 2000 Nov; 156(5):478-494. PubMed ID: 29587508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stochastic models for mainland-island metapopulations in static and dynamic landscapes. Ross JV Bull Math Biol; 2006 Feb; 68(2):417-49. PubMed ID: 16794938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Network topology and patch connectivity affect dynamics in experimental and model metapopulations. Arancibia PA; Morin PJ J Anim Ecol; 2022 Feb; 91(2):496-505. PubMed ID: 34873688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Species traits, patch turnover and successional dynamics: when does intermediate disturbance favour metapopulation occupancy? Mestre F; Pita R; Mira A; Beja P BMC Ecol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):2. PubMed ID: 31900154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancing the area-isolation paradigm: habitat heterogeneity and metapopulation dynamics of a rare wetland mammal. Schooley RL; Branch LC Ecol Appl; 2009 Oct; 19(7):1708-22. PubMed ID: 19831065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Refugia and connectivity sustain amphibian metapopulations afflicted by disease. Heard GW; Thomas CD; Hodgson JA; Scroggie MP; Ramsey DSL; Clemann N Ecol Lett; 2015 Aug; 18(8):853-863. PubMed ID: 26108261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrating social and ecological data to model metapopulation dynamics in coupled human and natural systems. Van Schmidt ND; Kovach T; Kilpatrick AM; Oviedo JL; Huntsinger L; Hruska T; Miller NL; Beissinger SR Ecology; 2019 Jun; 100(6):e02711. PubMed ID: 30927267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metapopulation persistence in random fragmented landscapes. Grilli J; Barabás G; Allesina S PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 May; 11(5):e1004251. PubMed ID: 25993004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How patch configuration affects the impact of disturbances on metapopulation persistence. Vuilleumier S; Wilcox C; Cairns BJ; Possingham HP Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Aug; 72(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 17275866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relative importance of local and regional processes to metapopulation dynamics. Dallas TA; Saastamoinen M; Schulz T; Ovaskainen O J Anim Ecol; 2020 Mar; 89(3):884-896. PubMed ID: 31705670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Epiphyte metapopulation dynamics are explained by species traits, connectivity, and patch dynamics. Johansson V; Ranius T; Snäll T Ecology; 2012 Feb; 93(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 22624304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]