These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22509457)

  • 1. Microleakage and Micrographic Evaluation of Composite Restorations with Various Bases over ZOE Layer in Pulpotomized Primary Molars.
    Bargrizan M; Mirkarimi M; Rezamand M; Eskandarion S
    J Dent (Tehran); 2011; 8(4):178-85. PubMed ID: 22509457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars -
    Thomas JM; Bhat SS; Amutha Prabha AE; Harris A; Rinu K; Mohan AP
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(Suppl 1):S78-S81. PubMed ID: 36110678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomized primary molars.
    Guelmann M; Bookmyer KL; Villalta P; García-Godoy F
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 15871455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of ZOE temporary restorations on microleakage in composite restorations.
    Yap AU; Shah KC; Loh ET; Sim SS; Tan CC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 11933904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micro leakage of composite resin restorations following contamination with primary teeth root canal filling materials: an in vitro study.
    Bawazir OA
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2014 Sep; 13(3):866-9. PubMed ID: 25284572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
    Bansal D; Mahajan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study.
    Mannocci F; Ferrari M; Watson TF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 11264937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of class II packable composite resin restorations using flowable composite and resin modified glass ionomers as intermediate layers.
    Majety KK; Pujar M
    J Conserv Dent; 2011 Oct; 14(4):414-7. PubMed ID: 22144815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer: An in vitro study.
    Eronat N; Yilmaz E; Kara N; Ak AT
    Eur J Dent; 2014 Oct; 8(4):450-455. PubMed ID: 25512723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A suitable base material for composite resin restorations: zinc oxide eugenol.
    He LH; Purton DG; Swain MV
    J Dent; 2010 Apr; 38(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 19961894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.
    Baghalian A; Nakhjavani YB; Hooshmand T; Motahhary P; Bahramian H
    Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of a copal varnish, ZOE or glass ionomer cement bases on microleakage of amalgam restorations.
    Manders CA; Garcia-Godoy F; Barnwell GM
    Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 2076225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of microleakage from stainless steel crowns margins used with different restorative materials: An in vitro study.
    Memarpour M; Derafshi R; Razavi M
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2016; 13(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 26962309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of Microleakage Using Dye Penetration Method in Primary Teeth Restored with Tooth-colored Materials: An
    Punathil S; Almalki SA; AlJameel AH; Gowdar IM; Mc VA; Chinnari K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul; 20(7):778-782. PubMed ID: 31597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars: An
    Mohammad N; Pattanaik S; Reddy TB; Animireddy D; Ankireddy S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 12(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 31496563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study.
    Popoff DA; Gonçalves FS; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Ferreira RC; Mjör IA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.