70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2250964)
21. Sveinsson chorioretinal atrophy: the mildest changes are located in the photoreceptor outer segment/retinal pigment epithelium junction.
Jonasson F; Sander B; Eysteinsson T; Jörgensen T; Klintworth GK
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Dec; 85(8):862-7. PubMed ID: 17683515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Static fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope with an automated threshold strategy.
Rohrschneider K; Fendrich T; Becker M; Krastel H; Kruse FE; Völcker HE
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1995 Dec; 233(12):743-9. PubMed ID: 8626081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reading with a macular scotoma. I. Retinal location of scotoma and fixation area.
Timberlake GT; Mainster MA; Peli E; Augliere RA; Essock EA; Arend LE
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1986 Jul; 27(7):1137-47. PubMed ID: 3721792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [The scanning laser ophthalmoscope and its use as a fluorescein angiography instrument].
Gabel VP; Birngruber R; Nasemann J
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1988; 85(5):569-73. PubMed ID: 3224934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Inverse stimuli in perimetric performance reveal larger visual field defects: implications for vision restoration.
Kasten E; Guenther T; Sabel BA
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2008; 26(4-5):355-64. PubMed ID: 18997311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Microperimetry in patients with central serous retinopathy.
Toonen F; Remky A; Janssen V; Wolf S; Reim M
Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Sep; 4(5):311-4. PubMed ID: 7496344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Vision restoration therapy (VRT) efficacy as assessed by comparative perimetric analysis and subjective questionnaires.
Sabel BA; Kenkel S; Kasten E
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2004; 22(6):399-420. PubMed ID: 15798360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope microperimetry compared with Octopus perimetry in normal subjects.
Andersen MV
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1996 Apr; 74(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 8739677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Use of scanning laser ophthalmoscope and scanning laser polarimeter in diagnosis and monitoring of early stages of primary open-angle glaucoma].
Wróbel A; Szostek-Helbig R; Przybylska K; Bednarski L; Leszczyński R
Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):203-5. PubMed ID: 15510500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A new instrument for the quantification of macular pigment density: first results in patients with AMD and healthy subjects.
Wüstemeyer H; Jahn C; Nestler A; Barth T; Wolf S
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):666-71. PubMed ID: 12192461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Oral fluorescein angiography with the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Garcia CR; Rivero ME; Bartsch DU; Ishiko S; Takamiya A; Fukui K; Hirokawa H; Clark T; Yoshida A; Freeman WR
Ophthalmology; 1999 Jun; 106(6):1114-8. PubMed ID: 10366079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Imaging the optic papilla with the laser scanning ophthalmoscope].
Frohn A; Jean B; Thiel HJ
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(2):168-70. PubMed ID: 2358273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The relaxed confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Van de Velde FJ
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2006; (302):25-35. PubMed ID: 17265788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Quantifying retinal capillary circulation using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope].
Wolf S; Toonen H; Arend O; Jung F; Kaupp A; Kiesewetter H; Meyer-Ebrecht D; Reim M
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1990 Jun; 35(6):131-4. PubMed ID: 2372567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Local and diffuse changes in the nerve fiber layer in glaucoma and vascular involvement of the optic papilla. Perimetry correlates].
Stürmer J; Gloor B
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 2272574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Image of the cornea with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope].
Frohn A; Jean B; Thiel HJ
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 1889776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retinal sensitivity measurement over drusen using scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry.
Takamine Y; Shiraki K; Moriwaki M; Yasunari T; Miki T
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Apr; 236(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 9561362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Recording pattern reversal visual evoked response with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Katsumi O; Timberlake GT; Hirose T; Van de Velde FJ; Sakaue H
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1989 Jun; 67(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 2763810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Distortion and size calibration of the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) laser-beam raster.
Timberlake GT; Sharma MK; Gobert DV; Maino JH
Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 80(11):772-7. PubMed ID: 14627945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Differences between pattern-evoked electroretinograms obtained by a scanning laser ophthalmoscope and by a mechanical mirror system.
Horn F; Korth M
Doc Ophthalmol; 1994; 88(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 7743914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
