These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22509753)

  • 1. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans.
    Elangovan S; Avila-Ortiz G; Johnson GK; Karimbux N; Allareddy V
    J Periodontol; 2013 Feb; 84(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 22509753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on short dental implants.
    Elangovan S; Mawardi HH; Karimbux NY
    J Periodontol; 2013 Jun; 84(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 22873652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews explained: AMSTAR-how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly.
    Sharif MO; Janjua-Sharif FN; Ali H; Ahmed F
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23474576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.
    Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T
    Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical appraisal of systematic reviews on the effect of a history of periodontitis on dental implant loss.
    Faggion CM; Giannakopoulos NN
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 May; 40(5):542-52. PubMed ID: 23557434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.
    Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic-related systematic reviews.
    Aziz T; Compton S; Nassar U; Matthews D; Ansari K; Flores-Mir C
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Apr; 40(4):263-78. PubMed ID: 23330989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental Students' Use of AMSTAR to Critically Appraise Systematic Reviews.
    Teich ST; Heima M; Lang L
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1031-9. PubMed ID: 26329027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodological quality assessment of paper-based systematic reviews published in oral health.
    Wasiak J; Shen AY; Tan HB; Mahar R; Kan G; Khoo WR; Faggion CM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Apr; 20(3):399-431. PubMed ID: 26589200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR).
    Shea BJ; Bouter LM; Peterson J; Boers M; Andersson N; Ortiz Z; Ramsay T; Bai A; Shukla VK; Grimshaw JM
    PLoS One; 2007 Dec; 2(12):e1350. PubMed ID: 18159233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in endodontics.
    Suebnukarn S; Ngamboonsirisingh S; Rattanabanlang A
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):602-8. PubMed ID: 20307731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of Biologic Agents to Promote Bone Formation in Implant Dentistry: A Critical Assessment of Systematic Reviews.
    Alarcón MA; Diaz KT; Aranda L; Cafferata EA; Faggion CM; Monje A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):271–281. PubMed ID: 27741328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Assessment of reliability and validity of assessment of multiple systematic reviews in Chinese systematic reviews on stomatology].
    Su N; Lü J; Li C; Chen L; Shi Z
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 31(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 23484302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluating the methodologic quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews].
    Coenen M; Schuetz GM; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2013 Oct; 185(10):937-40. PubMed ID: 24490255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Concept of Platform Switching to Preserve Peri-implant Bone Level: Assessment of Methodologic Quality of Systematic Reviews.
    Monje A; Pommer B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1084-92. PubMed ID: 26394345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.
    Kelly KD; Travers A; Dorgan M; Slater L; Rowe BH
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Nov; 38(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 11679863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.
    Shea B; Bouter LM; Grimshaw JM; Francis D; Ortiz Z; Wells GA; Tugwell PS; Boers M
    J Rheumatol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16267878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.