97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22509961)
1. Comparison of population level and individual level endpoints to evaluate ecological risk of chemicals.
Hanson N; Stark JD
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 May; 46(10):5590-8. PubMed ID: 22509961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reducing uncertainty of risk estimates for mixtures of chemicals within regulatory constraints.
Putzrath RM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Feb; 31(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 10715223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of population models to reduce uncertainty and increase value relevance in ecological risk assessments of pesticides: an example based on acute mortality data for daphnids.
Hanson N; Stark JD
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):262-70. PubMed ID: 21853521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ecological risk assessment of pollutant chemicals: extinction risk based on population-level effects.
Tanaka Y
Chemosphere; 2003 Oct; 53(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 12946399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A procedure for developing risk-based reference doses.
Gaylor DW; Kodell RL
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Apr; 35(2 Pt 1):137-41. PubMed ID: 12051999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individuals versus organisms versus populations in the definition of ecological assessment endpoints.
Suter GW; Norton SB; Fairbrother A
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2005 Nov; 1(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 16639906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Population-scale assessment endpoints in ecological risk assessment. Part 1: Reflections of stakeholder values.
Landis WG
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 16640323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of acute mortality and population growth rate as endpoints of toxicological effect.
Walthall WK; Stark JD
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1997 Jun; 37(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9212335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Avian transgenerational reproductive toxicity test with in ovo exposure.
Kamata R; Takahashi S; Shimizu A; Shiraishi F
Arch Toxicol; 2006 Dec; 80(12):846-56. PubMed ID: 16758213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals. I. Review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations.
Hommen U; Baveco JM; Galic N; van den Brink PJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 20821697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A retrospective analysis of the added value of the rat two-generation reproductive toxicity study versus the rat subchronic toxicity study.
Janer G; Hakkert BC; Piersma AH; Vermeire T; Slob W
Reprod Toxicol; 2007 Jul; 24(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17600672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Population-scale assessment endpoints in ecological risk assessment part II: selection of assessment endpoint attributes.
Landis WG; Kaminski LA
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jul; 3(3):450-7. PubMed ID: 17695116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Potential application of population models in the European ecological risk assessment of chemicals. II. Review of models and their potential to address environmental protection aims.
Galic N; Hommen U; Baveco JM; van den Brink PJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):338-60. PubMed ID: 20821698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanistic effect modeling for ecological risk assessment: where to go from here?
Grimm V; Martin BT
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e58-63. PubMed ID: 23564619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment factors for extrapolation from short-time to chronic exposure--are the REACH guidelines adequate?
Malkiewicz K; Hansson SO; Rudén C
Toxicol Lett; 2009 Oct; 190(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19540321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ecological interactions affecting population-level responses to chemical stress in Mesocyclops leuckarti.
Kulkarni D; Hommen U; Schäffer A; Preuss TG
Chemosphere; 2014 Oct; 112():340-7. PubMed ID: 25048925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From individual to population level effects of toxicants in the tubicifid Branchiura sowerbyi using threshold effect models in a Bayesian framework.
Ducrot V; Billoir E; Péry AR; Garric J; Charles S
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(9):3566-71. PubMed ID: 20380436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A retrospective analysis of the two-generation study: what is the added value of the second generation?
Janer G; Hakkert BC; Slob W; Vermeire T; Piersma AH
Reprod Toxicol; 2007 Jul; 24(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 17572063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of risks to ground-feeding songbirds from lead in the Coeur d'Alene Basin, Idaho, USA.
Sample BE; Hansen JA; Dailey A; Duncan B
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2011 Oct; 7(4):596-611. PubMed ID: 21793201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
