182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22510456)
1. Automatic assessment of atrial pacing threshold in current medical practice.
Rey JL; Quenum S; Hero M
Europace; 2012 Nov; 14(11):1615-9. PubMed ID: 22510456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduction of unnecessary right ventricular pacing by managed ventricular pacing and search AV+ algorithms in pacemaker patients: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized study.
Chen S; Chen K; Tao Q; Zheng L; Shen F; Wu S; Fan J; Xu G; Wang L; Zhou X; Zhang S;
Europace; 2014 Nov; 16(11):1595-602. PubMed ID: 24706091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of pacemaker automatic capture management and atrioventricular interval extension algorithm.
Chen KP; Xu G; Wu S; Tang B; Wang L; Zhang S;
Europace; 2013 Mar; 15(3):395-401. PubMed ID: 23243132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Atrial threshold variability: implications for automatic atrial stimulation algorithms.
Biffi M; Spitali G; Silvetti MS; Argnani S; Rubino I; Fontana P; Barbato G; Mazzini E; De Santo T; Drago F; Boriani G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Dec; 30(12):1445-54. PubMed ID: 18070297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block.
Gillis AM; Pürerfellner H; Israel CW; Sunthorn H; Kacet S; Anelli-Monti M; Tang F; Young M; Boriani G;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relationship between right ventricular pacing and atrial fibrillation burden and disease progression in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the long-MinVPACE study.
Veasey RA; Arya A; Silberbauer J; Sharma V; Lloyd GW; Patel NR; Sulke AN
Europace; 2011 Jun; 13(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 21208945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does atrial pacing lead to atrial fibrillation in patients with sick sinus syndrome? Insights from the DANPACE trial.
Hjortshøj S; Riahi S; Nielsen JC; Skjøth F; Lundbye-Christensen S; Andersen HR;
Europace; 2014 Feb; 16(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 24169735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic atrial threshold measurement and adjustment in pediatric patients.
Hiippala A; Serwer GA; Clausson E; Davenport L; Brand T; Happonen JM
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 Mar; 33(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 19954505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence.
Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F
G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Near elimination of ventricular pacing in SafeR mode compared to DDD modes: a randomized study of 422 patients.
Davy JM; Hoffmann E; Frey A; Jocham K; Rossi S; Dupuis JM; Frabetti L; Ducloux P; Prades E; Jauvert G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Apr; 35(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 22309303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Permanent atrial stimulation (AAI) in the sick sinus syndrome].
Goicolea de Oro A; Chicote R; López-Gil M; Márquez L; Botella M; García-Cosío F
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1990; 43 Suppl 2():52-7. PubMed ID: 2236799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased base rate of atrial pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation after implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker: insights from the Atrial Overdrive Pacing Study.
Kantharia BK; Freedman RA; Hoekenga D; Tomassoni G; Worley S; Sorrentino R; Steinhaus D; Wolkowicz JM; Syed ZA;
Europace; 2007 Nov; 9(11):1024-30. PubMed ID: 17913697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Circadian pattern of atrial pacing threshold in the young.
Silvetti MS; De Santis A; Marcora S; De Santo T; Grovale N; Drago F
Europace; 2008 Feb; 10(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 18256120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The OPTI-MIND study: a prospective, observational study of pacemaker patients according to pacing modality and primary indications.
Biffi M; Melissano D; Rossi P; Kaliska G; Havliĉek A; Pelargonio G; Romero R; Guastaferro C; Menichelli M; Vireca E; Frisoni J; Boriani G; Malacky T
Europace; 2014 May; 16(5):689-97. PubMed ID: 24500787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of a pacing mode preserving spontaneous AV conduction on ventricular pacing burden and atrial arrhythmias.
Rey JL; Quenum S; Hero M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 May; 35(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 22339661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative evaluation of various methods of continuous electric stimulation of the heart in bradycardia].
Drogaĭtsev AD
Kardiologiia; 1990 Feb; 30(2):5-11. PubMed ID: 2348620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AAIsafeR limits ventricular pacing in unselected patients.
Pioger G; Leny G; Nitzsché R; Ripart A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S66-70. PubMed ID: 17302721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Usefulness of atrial vulnerability in predicting atrial fibrillation in patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with DDD pacemaker].
Chiarandà G; Di Guardo G; Doria G; Castelli D; Lazzaro A; Mangiameli S
G Ital Cardiol; 1999 Jan; 29(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9987049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic and dual-site atrial pacing in the prevention of atrial fibrillation: The STimolazione Atrial DInamica Multisito (STADIM) Study.
De Simone A; Senatore G; Donnici G; Turco P; Romano E; Gazzola C; Stabile G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S71-4. PubMed ID: 17302722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing automatic threshold tracking for continuous capture verification: a single-center prospective study.
Verma PK; Sharma JK; Khan IA; Bali HK; Varma JS; Bhargava M; Sharma YP; Grover A
Indian Heart J; 2001; 53(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 11759937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
