These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22511273)

  • 1. Severe hemolysis associated with use of the Impella LP 2.5 mechanical assist device.
    Sibbald M; Džavík V
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Nov; 80(5):840-4. PubMed ID: 22511273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined hemodynamic support with the Impella 2.5 device and intra-aortic balloon pump for management of refractory cardiogenic shock.
    Pavlidis AN; Redwood SR; Clapp BR
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):E50-1. PubMed ID: 24791724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel technique of performing multivessel PCI through an Impella sheath.
    Kumar K; Reddy S; Acharya D; Lotun K
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):117-120. PubMed ID: 31696630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness and safety of the Impella ventricular assist device for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review.
    Ait Ichou J; Larivée N; Eisenberg MJ; Suissa K; Filion KB
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 28941078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An unexpected cause of massive hemolysis in percutaneous left ventricular assist device.
    Tanawuttiwat T; Chaparro SV
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(1):66-7. PubMed ID: 23219128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Successful Use of Surgically Placed Impella 5.0 and Central Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Circuit in a Patient with Postcardiotomy Shock.
    Abu Saleh WK; Mason P; Jabbari OA; Samir H; Bruckner BA
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2015 Dec; 42(6):569-71. PubMed ID: 26664314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short-term mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 device for cardiogenic shock at La Pitié-Salpêtrière.
    Mastroianni C; Bouabdallaoui N; Leprince P; Lebreton G
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2017 Feb; 6(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 26873912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiogenic shock secondary to severe acute ischemic mitral regurgitation managed with an Impella 2.5 percutaneous left ventricular assist device.
    Harmon L; Boccalandro F
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jun; 79(7):1129-34. PubMed ID: 21805597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prophylactic use of intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: will the Impella LP 2.5 device show superiority in a clinical randomized study?
    Syed AI; Kakkar A; Torguson R; Li Y; Ben-Dor I; Collins SD; Lemesle G; Maluenda G; Xue Z; Scheinowitz M; Kaneshige K; Satler LF; Kent KM; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Lindsay J; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2010; 11(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 20347798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the USpella Registry.
    Maini B; Naidu SS; Mulukutla S; Kleiman N; Schreiber T; Wohns D; Dixon S; Rihal C; Dave R; O'Neill W
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Nov; 80(5):717-25. PubMed ID: 22105829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-world supported unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention with impella device; data from the USpella registry.
    Schreiber T; Wah Htun W; Blank N; Telila T; Mercado N; Briasoulis A; Kaki A; Kondur A; Munir A; Grines C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Oct; 90(4):576-581. PubMed ID: 28417594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Circulatory support for shock complicating myocardial infarction.
    Acharya D; Loyaga-Rendon RY; Tallaj JA; Pamboukian SV; Sasse MF
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Aug; 26(8):E109-14. PubMed ID: 25091104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impella 5.0 Support in INTERMACS II Cardiogenic Shock Patients Using Right and Left Axillary Artery Access.
    Schibilsky D; Lausberg H; Haller C; Lenglinger M; Woernle B; Haeberle H; Rosenberger P; Walker T; Schlensak C
    Artif Organs; 2015 Aug; 39(8):660-3. PubMed ID: 26147682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utilization of the Impella for hemodynamic support during percutaneous intervention and cardiogenic shock: an insight.
    Nalluri N; Patel N; Saouma S; Anugu VR; Anugula D; Asti D; Mehta V; Kumar V; Atti V; Edla S; Grewal RK; Khan HM; Kanotra R; Maniatis G; Kandov R; Lafferty JC; Dyal M; Alfonso CE; Cohen MG
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2017 Oct; 14(10):789-804. PubMed ID: 28862481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group.
    Doshi R; Patel K; Decter D; Jauhar R; Meraj P
    Indian Heart J; 2018 Jul; 70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-S95. PubMed ID: 30122245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary experience with Impella Recover(®) LP5.0 in nine patients with cardiogenic shock: a new circulatory support system in the intensive cardiac care unit.
    Bresson D; Sibellas F; Farhat F; Jegaden O; Kirkorian G; Bonnefoy E
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2011 Aug; 104(8-9):458-64. PubMed ID: 21944148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Impella ventricular assist device: use in patients at high risk for coronary interventions: successful multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in a 62-year-old high-risk patient.
    Marella PC; Lassetter JE; Heuser RR
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2011; 12(1):69.e9-12. PubMed ID: 21036108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical circulatory support with impella to facilitate percutaneous coronary intervention for post-TAVI bilateral coronary obstruction.
    Frisoli TM; Guerrero M; O'Neill WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 88(1):E34-7. PubMed ID: 26104838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impella removal with access site salvage.
    Yager N; Waxman S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 29481717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Aggarwal B; Aman W; Jeroudi O; Kleiman NS
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2018; 14(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 29623169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.