149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22511559)
1. Clinically oriented three-step strategy for assessment of adnexal pathology.
Ameye L; Timmerman D; Valentin L; Paladini D; Zhang J; Van Holsbeke C; Lissoni AA; Savelli L; Veldman J; Testa AC; Amant F; Van Huffel S; Bourne T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 22511559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX: a Portuguese multicenter study.
Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ADNEX model to triage adnexal masses: An external validation study and comparison with the IOTA two-step strategy and subjective assessment by an experienced ultrasound operator.
Viora E; Piovano E; Baima Poma C; Cotrino I; Castiglione A; Cavallero C; Sciarrone A; Bastonero S; Iskra L; Zola P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():207-211. PubMed ID: 32146226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of IOTA logistic regression models LR1 and LR2 in comparison with subjective pattern recognition for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in an outpatient setting.
Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):829-835. PubMed ID: 28976616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasound-based logistic regression model LR2 versus magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study.
Shimada K; Matsumoto K; Mimura T; Ishikawa T; Munechika J; Ohgiya Y; Kushima M; Hirose Y; Asami Y; Iitsuka C; Miyamoto S; Onuki M; Tsunoda H; Matsuoka R; Ichizuka K; Sekizawa A
Int J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 23(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 29236181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study.
Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Timmerman D; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Fruscio R; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Pascual MA; Testa AC; Ameye L; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):324-334. PubMed ID: 32853459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of IOTA three-step strategy and logistic regression model LR2 for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Hidalgo JJ; Llueca A; Zolfaroli I; Veiga N; Ortiz E; Alcázar JL
Med Ultrason; 2021 May; 23(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 33626112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of the IOTA SRR and LR2 scoring systems for discriminating between malignant and Benign Adnexal masses by junior physicians in Chinese patients: a retrospective observational study.
Tian C; Wen SB; Zhao CY; Yan XN; Du JX
BMC Womens Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 37940895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay.
Di Legge A; Pollastri P; Mancari R; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Franchi D; Jurkovic D; Coccia ME; Timmerman D; Scambia G; Testa A; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 28004457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study.
Stukan M; Badocha M; Ratajczak K
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):564. PubMed ID: 31185938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound examination, MRI, or ROMA for discriminating between inconclusive adnexal masses as determined by IOTA Simple Rules: a prospective study.
Chacon E; Arraiza M; Manzour N; Benito A; Mínguez JÁ; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chiva L; Alcazar JL
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Jun; 33(6):951-956. PubMed ID: 37055169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-Step Strategy for Optimizing the Preoperative Classification of Adnexal Masses in a University Hospital, Using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Models: Simple Rules and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model.
Esquivel Villabona AL; Rodríguez JN; Ayala N; Buriticá C; Gómez AC; Velandia AM; Rodríguez N; Alcázar JL
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Feb; 41(2):471-482. PubMed ID: 33890698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scoring systems for the evaluation of adnexal masses nature: current knowledge and clinical applications.
Terzic M; Aimagambetova G; Norton M; Della Corte L; Marín-Buck A; Lisón JF; Amer-Cuenca JJ; Zito G; Garzon S; Caruso S; Rapisarda AMC; Cianci A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Apr; 41(3):340-347. PubMed ID: 32347750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of preoperative evaluation of postmenopausal ovarian tumors.
Niemi RJ; Saarelainen SK; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
J Ovarian Res; 2017 Mar; 10(1):15. PubMed ID: 28288666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the performance of IOTA simple rules: sonographic assessment of adnexal masses with resource-effective use of a magnetic resonance scoring (ADNEX MR scoring system).
Pereira PN; Sarian LO; Yoshida A; Araújo KG; Silva ACB; de Oliveira Barros RH; Jales RM; Derchain S
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Oct; 45(10):3218-3229. PubMed ID: 31482379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
