These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

650 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22512266)

  • 41. Redundancy in Glucose Sensing: Enhanced Accuracy and Reliability of an Electrochemical Redundant Sensor for Continuous Glucose Monitoring.
    Sharifi A; Varsavsky A; Ulloa J; Horsburgh JC; McAuley SA; Krishnamurthy B; Jenkins AJ; Colman PG; Ward GM; MacIsaac RJ; Shah R; O'Neal DN
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 May; 10(3):669-78. PubMed ID: 26499476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Head-to-head comparison between flash and continuous glucose monitoring systems in outpatients with type 1 diabetes.
    Bonora B; Maran A; Ciciliot S; Avogaro A; Fadini GP
    J Endocrinol Invest; 2016 Dec; 39(12):1391-1399. PubMed ID: 27287421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy and Safety of an Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: The PRECISION Study.
    Christiansen MP; Klaff LJ; Bailey TS; Brazg R; Carlson G; Tweden KS
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2019 May; 21(5):231-237. PubMed ID: 30925083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. From Two to One Per Day Calibration of Dexcom G4 Platinum by a Time-Varying Day-Specific Bayesian Prior.
    Acciaroli G; Vettoretti M; Facchinetti A; Sparacino G; Cobelli C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2016 Aug; 18(8):472-9. PubMed ID: 27512826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Point accuracy of interstitial continuous glucose monitoring during exercise in type 1 diabetes.
    Yardley JE; Sigal RJ; Kenny GP; Riddell MC; Lovblom LE; Perkins BA
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2013 Jan; 15(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 23137050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improvement in glycemic excursions with a transcutaneous, real-time continuous glucose sensor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Garg S; Zisser H; Schwartz S; Bailey T; Kaplan R; Ellis S; Jovanovic L
    Diabetes Care; 2006 Jan; 29(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 16373894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison between one-point calibration and two-point calibration approaches in a continuous glucose monitoring algorithm.
    Mahmoudi Z; Johansen MD; Christiansen JS; Hejlesen O
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 8(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 24876420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Hypo- and Hyperglycemic Alarms: Devices and Algorithms.
    Howsmon D; Bequette BW
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 9(5):1126-37. PubMed ID: 25931581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Do sensor glucose levels accurately predict plasma glucose concentrations during hypoglycemia and hyperinsulinemia?
    Monsod TP; Flanagan DE; Rife F; Saenz R; Caprio S; Sherwin RS; Tamborlane WV
    Diabetes Care; 2002 May; 25(5):889-93. PubMed ID: 11978686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Blood glucose estimation and symptoms during hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
    Weinger K; Jacobson AM; Draelos MT; Finkelstein DM; Simonson DC
    Am J Med; 1995 Jan; 98(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 7825615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. First application of a transcutaneous optical single-port glucose monitoring device in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
    Rumpler M; Mader JK; Fischer JP; Thar R; Granger JM; Deliane F; Klimant I; Aberer F; Sinner F; Pieber TR; Hajnsek M
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2017 Feb; 88():240-248. PubMed ID: 27554063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Glucose concentration can be predicted ahead in time from continuous glucose monitoring sensor time-series.
    Sparacino G; Zanderigo F; Corazza S; Maran A; Facchinetti A; Cobelli C
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 54(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17518291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluating the accuracy, reliability, and clinical applicability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): Is CGM ready for real time?
    Mazze RS; Strock E; Borgman S; Wesley D; Stout P; Racchini J
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Jan; 11(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 19132850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Use of flash glucose-sensing technology (FreeStyle Libre) in youth with type 1 diabetes: AWeSoMe study group real-life observational experience.
    Landau Z; Abiri S; Gruber N; Levy-Shraga Y; Brener A; Lebenthal Y; Barash G; Pinhas-Hamiel O; Rachmiel M
    Acta Diabetol; 2018 Dec; 55(12):1303-1310. PubMed ID: 30171412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A clinical trial of the accuracy and treatment experience of the Dexcom G4 sensor (Dexcom G4 system) and Enlite sensor (guardian REAL-time system) tested simultaneously in ambulatory patients with type 1 diabetes.
    Matuleviciene V; Joseph JI; Andelin M; Hirsch IB; Attvall S; Pivodic A; Dahlqvist S; Klonoff D; Haraldsson B; Lind M
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Nov; 16(11):759-67. PubMed ID: 25233297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of performing morning versus afternoon exercise on glycemic control and hypoglycemia frequency in type 1 diabetes patients on sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy.
    Gomez AM; Gomez C; Aschner P; Veloza A; Muñoz O; Rubio C; Vallejo S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 May; 9(3):619-24. PubMed ID: 25555390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A Personalized Week-to-Week Updating Algorithm to Improve Continuous Glucose Monitoring Performance.
    Zavitsanou S; Lee JB; Pinsker JE; Church MM; Doyle FJ; Dassau E
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1070-1079. PubMed ID: 29032732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Toward Calibration-Free Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: Bayesian Calibration Approach Applied to Next-Generation Dexcom Technology.
    Acciaroli G; Vettoretti M; Facchinetti A; Sparacino G
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jan; 20(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 29265916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Rate-of-Change Dependence of the Performance of Two CGM Systems During Induced Glucose Swings.
    Pleus S; Schoemaker M; Morgenstern K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Link M; Zschornack E; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 25852074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Continuous Glucose Monitoring System during pregnancy of women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: accuracy assessment.
    Kerssen A; de Valk HW; Visser GH
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2004 Oct; 6(5):645-51. PubMed ID: 15628818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.