These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22512773)

  • 1. Matching cavities in g protein-coupled receptors to infer ligand-binding sites.
    Madala PK; Fairlie DP; Bodén M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1401-10. PubMed ID: 22512773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Location and nature of the residues important for ligand recognition in G-protein coupled receptors.
    Bywater RP
    J Mol Recognit; 2005; 18(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 15386622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of a novel protein-ligand fingerprint to mine chemogenomic space: application to G protein-coupled receptors and their ligands.
    Weill N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1049-62. PubMed ID: 19301874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Agonist-induced conformational changes in bovine rhodopsin: insight into activation of G-protein-coupled receptors.
    Bhattacharya S; Hall SE; Vaidehi N
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Oct; 382(2):539-55. PubMed ID: 18638482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PREDICT modeling and in-silico screening for G-protein coupled receptors.
    Shacham S; Marantz Y; Bar-Haim S; Kalid O; Warshaviak D; Avisar N; Inbal B; Heifetz A; Fichman M; Topf M; Naor Z; Noiman S; Becker OM
    Proteins; 2004 Oct; 57(1):51-86. PubMed ID: 15326594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulations of a G protein-coupled receptor homology model predict dynamic features and a ligand binding site.
    Wolf S; Böckmann M; Höweler U; Schlitter J; Gerwert K
    FEBS Lett; 2008 Oct; 582(23-24):3335-42. PubMed ID: 18775703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expanding GPCR homology model binding sites via a balloon potential: A molecular dynamics refinement approach.
    Kimura SR; Tebben AJ; Langley DR
    Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1919-29. PubMed ID: 18175323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of automated in silico ligand docking of amino acid ligands to Family C G-protein coupled receptors.
    Wang M; Hampson DR
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2006 Mar; 14(6):2032-9. PubMed ID: 16297630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Homology model adjustment and ligand screening with a pseudoreceptor of the human histamine H4 receptor.
    Tanrikulu Y; Proschak E; Werner T; Geppert T; Todoroff N; Klenner A; Kottke T; Sander K; Schneider E; Seifert R; Stark H; Clark T; Schneider G
    ChemMedChem; 2009 May; 4(5):820-7. PubMed ID: 19343764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery.
    Lagerström MC; Schiöth HB
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2008 Apr; 7(4):339-57. PubMed ID: 18382464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular modeling studies on the human neuropeptide S receptor and its antagonists.
    Dal Ben D; Antonini I; Buccioni M; Lambertucci C; Marucci G; Vittori S; Volpini R; Cristalli G
    ChemMedChem; 2010 Mar; 5(3):371-83. PubMed ID: 20087922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An automated system for the analysis of G protein-coupled receptor transmembrane binding pockets: alignment, receptor-based pharmacophores, and their application.
    Kratochwil NA; Malherbe P; Lindemann L; Ebeling M; Hoener MC; Mühlemann A; Porter RH; Stahl M; Gerber PR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(5):1324-36. PubMed ID: 16180909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognition of privileged structures by G-protein coupled receptors.
    Bondensgaard K; Ankersen M; Thøgersen H; Hansen BS; Wulff BS; Bywater RP
    J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):888-99. PubMed ID: 14761190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Definition of the G protein-coupled receptor transmembrane bundle binding pocket and calculation of receptor similarities for drug design.
    Gloriam DE; Foord SM; Blaney FE; Garland SL
    J Med Chem; 2009 Jul; 52(14):4429-42. PubMed ID: 19537715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-142 does not contribute to relaxin-3 binding in the mouse brain: further support that relaxin-3 is the physiological ligand for GPCR135.
    Sutton SW; Bonaventure P; Kuei C; Nepomuceno D; Wu J; Zhu J; Lovenberg TW; Liu C
    Neuroendocrinology; 2005; 82(3-4):139-50. PubMed ID: 16679775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A physicogenetic method to assign ligand-binding relationships between 7TM receptors.
    Frimurer TM; Ulven T; Elling CE; Gerlach LO; Kostenis E; Högberg T
    Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2005 Aug; 15(16):3707-12. PubMed ID: 15993056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finding ligands for G protein-coupled receptors based on the protein-compound affinity matrix.
    Fukunishi Y; Kubota S; Nakamura H
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jan; 25(5):633-43. PubMed ID: 16777448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ligand and decoy sets for docking to G protein-coupled receptors.
    Gatica EA; Cavasotto CN
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22168315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical analysis and prediction of functional residues effective for GPCR-G-protein coupling selectivity.
    Muramatsu T; Suwa M
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2006 Jun; 19(6):277-83. PubMed ID: 16565146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of G-Protein Coupled Receptors suitable targets?
    Bissantz C; Bernard P; Hibert M; Rognan D
    Proteins; 2003 Jan; 50(1):5-25. PubMed ID: 12471595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.