257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22512837)
1. The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity.
Fujii Y
Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):669-70; author reply 670. PubMed ID: 22512837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of data integrity.
McCann JC; Hudes ML; Ames BN
Anaesthesia; 2012 Sep; 67(9):1042-3. PubMed ID: 22861504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. On statistical methods to test if sampling in trials is genuinely random.
Pandit JJ
Anaesthesia; 2012 May; 67(5):456-462. PubMed ID: 22404285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Putting the record straight: granisetron's efficacy as an antiemetic 'post-Fujii'.
Kranke P
Anaesthesia; 2012 Oct; 67(10):1063-7. PubMed ID: 22897144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
Yentis SM
Anaesthesia; 2012 May; 67(5):455-456. PubMed ID: 22404377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiplicity in oncology randomised controlled trials: a threat to medical evidence?
Prasad V; Booth CM
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1638-1640. PubMed ID: 31797779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Missing data in rheumatologic studies and the practical reality of modern approaches to the analysis of incomplete subject data: comment on the article by Baron et al and the editorial by Boers.
Steele R; Hudson M
Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Sep; 59(9):1367-8. PubMed ID: 18759312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trials.
Dumville JC; Torgerson DJ; Hewitt CE
BMJ; 2006 Apr; 332(7547):969-71. PubMed ID: 16627519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity.
Carlisle JB
Anaesthesia; 2012 May; 67(5):521-537. PubMed ID: 22404311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Believability of clinical trials: a diagnostic testing perspective.
Lauer MS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):249-51. PubMed ID: 16872945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review.
Sun X; Briel M; Busse JW; You JJ; Akl EA; Mejza F; Bala MM; Bassler D; Mertz D; Diaz-Granados N; Vandvik PO; Malaga G; Srinathan SK; Dahm P; Johnston BC; Alonso-Coello P; Hassouneh B; Walter SD; Heels-Ansdell D; Bhatnagar N; Altman DG; Guyatt GH
BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e1553. PubMed ID: 22422832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS: EVOLVING CHANGES ACCORDING TO PERSONALIZED MEDICINE].
Ernest P; Jandrain B; Scheen AJ
Rev Med Liege; 2015; 70(5-6):232-6. PubMed ID: 26285444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association between bibliometric parameters, reporting and methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in vascular and endovascular surgery.
Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Antoniou GA; Green PA; Maden M; Torella F
Vascular; 2017 Apr; 25(2):196-207. PubMed ID: 27252347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistics notes: missing outcomes in randomised trials.
Vickers AJ; Altman DG
BMJ; 2013 Jun; 346():f3438. PubMed ID: 23744649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Editorial: Randomised controlled trials of factorial design alias on how to speed up research on effectiveness of interventions without compromising its validity.
Esposito M; Nieri M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 27022633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Placebo disclosure rate in randomized controlled trials involving critically ill patients.
Sonawane R; Jones M; Kruger P; Venkatesh B; Rao J
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2012 Sep; 186(5):463-4. PubMed ID: 22942349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.
Walker A; Nixon J
J Wound Care; 2004 Mar; 13(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 15045804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Importance of proper conduct of clinical trials.
Cortegiani A; Absalom AR
Br J Anaesth; 2021 Feb; 126(2):354-356. PubMed ID: 33121749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Guided by the research design: choosing the right statistical test.
Beath A; Jones MP
Med J Aust; 2018 Mar; 208(4):163-165. PubMed ID: 29490219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Yes, size does matter!: Sample size calculations for randomised trials.
Middleton L
BJOG; 2020 Jul; 127(8):1016-1017. PubMed ID: 31910329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
