These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22512837)
21. ALS issues in clinical trials. Missing data. Thompson JL; Levy G Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord; 2004 Sep; 5 Suppl 1():48-51. PubMed ID: 15512872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The quality of reports of randomized trials in multiple sclerosis: a review. Signori A; Baccino A; Sormani MP Mult Scler; 2012 Jun; 18(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 22495947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The clinician as investigator: participating in clinical trials in the practice setting: Appendix 2: statistical concepts in study design and analysis. Lader EW; Cannon CP; Ohman EM; Newby LK; Sulmasy DP; Barst RJ; Fair JM; Flather M; Freedman JE; Frye RL; Hand MM; Jesse RL; Van de Werf F; Costa F; Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(21):e305-7. PubMed ID: 15173053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Review of randomized controlled trials: issues to consider when designing a trial. Pandis N Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):905-7. PubMed ID: 23726342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A statistic to avoid being misled by the "winners curse". Tugwell P; Knottnerus JA J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 103():vi-viii. PubMed ID: 30293635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Statistical principles: myths or facts? Sylvester R Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):520-1. PubMed ID: 14709923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Statistical trial designs and clinical practice: are they compatible? Punt CJ Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):518-9. PubMed ID: 14709922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Designing randomised trials: both large and small trials are needed. Stenning SP; Parmar MK Ann Oncol; 2002; 13 Suppl 4():131-8. PubMed ID: 12401679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Re: The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials. Shrier I Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2740-1; author reply 2741-2. PubMed ID: 18069729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost data for individual patients included in clinical studies: no amount of statistical analysis can compensate for inadequate costing methods. Graves N; Walker D; Raine R; Hutchings A; Roberts JA Health Econ; 2002 Dec; 11(8):735-9. PubMed ID: 12457373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reporting of sample-size calculations for randomized trials in dermatology: comparison of publications with registries. Weinberg T; Wang G; Lam K; Kitchen J; Chan AW Br J Dermatol; 2019 Apr; 180(4):929-930. PubMed ID: 30339744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Is Propensity Score Analysis a Valid Surrogate of Randomization for the Avoidance of Allocation Bias? Torres F; Ríos J; Saez-Peñataro J; Pontes C Semin Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 37(3):275-286. PubMed ID: 28847037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]