These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22513383)

  • 21. Spike detection from noisy neural data in linear-probe recordings.
    Takekawa T; Ota K; Murayama M; Fukai T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 39(11):1943-50. PubMed ID: 24827558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Removal of spurious correlations between spikes and local field potentials.
    Zanos TP; Mineault PJ; Pack CC
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Jan; 105(1):474-86. PubMed ID: 21068271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial filters and automated spike detection based on brain topographies improve sensitivity of EEG-fMRI studies in focal epilepsy.
    Siniatchkin M; Moeller F; Jacobs J; Stephani U; Boor R; Wolff S; Jansen O; Siebner H; Scherg M
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):834-43. PubMed ID: 17627849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recording and online analysis of auditory steady state responses (ASSR) in Matlab.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Mar; 187(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 20036283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Artifact correction and source analysis of early electroencephalographic responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cortex.
    Litvak V; Komssi S; Scherg M; Hoechstetter K; Classen J; Zaaroor M; Pratt H; Kahkonen S
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 17574872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Unmasking local activity within local field potentials (LFPs) by removing distal electrical signals using independent component analysis.
    Whitmore NW; Lin SC
    Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():79-92. PubMed ID: 26899209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and MEG recordings.
    Vigário R; Särelä J; Jousmäki V; Hämäläinen M; Oja E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 May; 47(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 10851802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An integrated system for multichannel neuronal recording with spike/LFP separation, integrated A/D conversion and threshold detection.
    Perelman Y; Ginosar R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 17260864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. ERP denoising in multichannel EEG data using contrasts between signal and noise subspaces.
    Ivannikov A; Kalyakin I; Hämäläinen J; Leppänen PH; Ristaniemi T; Lyytinen H; Kärkkäinen T
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun; 180(2):340-51. PubMed ID: 19464521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sleep spindles and spike-wave discharges in EEG: Their generic features, similarities and distinctions disclosed with Fourier transform and continuous wavelet analysis.
    Sitnikova E; Hramov AE; Koronovsky AA; van Luijtelaar G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun; 180(2):304-16. PubMed ID: 19383511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An integrative analysis platform for multiple neural spike train data.
    Huang Y; Li X; Li Y; Xu Q; Lu Q; Liu Q
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Jul; 172(2):303-11. PubMed ID: 18538855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Filtering noise for synchronised activity in multi-trial electrophysiology data using Wiener and Kalman filters.
    Zhan Y; Guo S; Kendrick KM; Feng J
    Biosystems; 2009 Apr; 96(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19084574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Setting adaptive spike detection threshold for smoothed TEO based on robust statistics theory.
    Semmaoui H; Drolet J; Lakhssassi A; Sawan M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Feb; 59(2):474-82. PubMed ID: 22084039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improved signal and reduced noise in neural recordings from close-spaced electrode arrays using independent component analysis as a preprocessor.
    Snellings A; Anderson DJ; Aldridge JW
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Jan; 150(2):254-64. PubMed ID: 16430966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An evaluation of automated neonatal seizure detection methods.
    Faul S; Boylan G; Connolly S; Marnane L; Lightbody G
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 116(7):1533-41. PubMed ID: 15897008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparative study of automatic techniques for ocular artifact reduction in spontaneous EEG signals based on clinical target variables: a simulation case.
    Romero S; Mañanas MA; Barbanoj MJ
    Comput Biol Med; 2008 Mar; 38(3):348-60. PubMed ID: 18222418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tracking spike-amplitude changes to improve the quality of multineuronal data analysis.
    Kaneko H; Tamura H; Suzuki SS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Feb; 54(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 17278583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automatic removal of various artifacts from EEG signals using combined methods.
    Gao J; Yang Y; Sun J; Yu G
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 27(5):312-20. PubMed ID: 20844440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Removal of EEG noise and artifact using blind source separation.
    Fitzgibbon SP; Powers DM; Pope KJ; Clark CR
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 24(3):232-43. PubMed ID: 17545826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Filtering and thresholding the analytic signal envelope in order to improve peak and spike noise reduction in EEG signals.
    Melia U; Clariá F; Vallverdú M; Caminal P
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Apr; 36(4):547-53. PubMed ID: 24365255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.