These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22514094)

  • 1. Consumer preferences for hearing aid attributes: a comparison of rating and conjoint analysis methods.
    Bridges JF; Lataille AT; Buttorff C; White S; Niparko JK
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Mar; 16(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 22514094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable.
    Dawes P; Hopkins R; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):472-7. PubMed ID: 23594421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functionality of hearing aids: state-of-the-art and future model-based solutions.
    Kollmeier B; Kiessling J
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S3-S28. PubMed ID: 27951738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications.
    Kortlang S; Chen Z; Gerkmann T; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Ewert SD
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S43-S54. PubMed ID: 28355947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Observations from a musician with hearing loss.
    Einhorn R
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 23203415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory training of speech recognition with interrupted and continuous noise maskers by children with hearing impairment.
    Sullivan JR; Thibodeau LM; Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):495-501. PubMed ID: 23297921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvements in speech understanding with wireless binaural broadband digital hearing instruments in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kreisman BM; Mazevski AG; Schum DJ; Sockalingam R
    Trends Amplif; 2010 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 20457725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiologist-driven versus patient-driven fine tuning of hearing instruments.
    Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Mar; 16(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 22143874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examination of a hybrid beamformer that preserves auditory spatial cues.
    Best V; Roverud E; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL369. PubMed ID: 29092558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
    Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kulkarni PN; Pandey PC; Jangamashetti DS
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22201526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of real-world preferences and performance of hearing aids fitted according to the NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 procedures in children with moderately severe to profound hearing loss.
    Quar TK; Ching TY; Newall P; Sharma M
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):322-32. PubMed ID: 23570290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors in client-clinician interaction that influence hearing aid adoption.
    Poost-Foroosh L; Jennings MB; Shaw L; Meston CN; Cheesman MF
    Trends Amplif; 2011 Sep; 15(3):127-39. PubMed ID: 22155784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.