BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22515559)

  • 1. Quantitative comparison of immunohistochemical staining measured by digital image analysis versus pathologist visual scoring.
    Rizzardi AE; Johnson AT; Vogel RI; Pambuccian SE; Henriksen J; Skubitz AP; Metzger GJ; Schmechel SC
    Diagn Pathol; 2012 Jun; 7():42. PubMed ID: 22515559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative comparison and reproducibility of pathologist scoring and digital image analysis of estrogen receptor β2 immunohistochemistry in prostate cancer.
    Rizzardi AE; Zhang X; Vogel RI; Kolb S; Geybels MS; Leung YK; Henriksen JC; Ho SM; Kwak J; Stanford JL; Schmechel SC
    Diagn Pathol; 2016 Jul; 11(1):63. PubMed ID: 27401406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of image compression and scaling on automated scoring of immunohistochemical stainings and segmentation of tumor epithelium.
    Konsti J; Lundin M; Linder N; Haglund C; Blomqvist C; Nevanlinna H; Aaltonen K; Nordling S; Lundin J
    Diagn Pathol; 2012 Mar; 7():29. PubMed ID: 22436596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Membrane connectivity estimated by digital image analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry is concordant with visual scoring and fluorescence in situ hybridization results: algorithm evaluation on breast cancer tissue microarrays.
    Laurinaviciene A; Dasevicius D; Ostapenko V; Jarmalaite S; Lazutka J; Laurinavicius A
    Diagn Pathol; 2011 Sep; 6():87. PubMed ID: 21943197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Persistent homology index as a robust quantitative measure of immunohistochemical scoring.
    Takiyama A; Teramoto T; Suzuki H; Yamashiro K; Tanaka S
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):14002. PubMed ID: 29070862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Image Analysis Solution For Quantification and Determination of Immunohistochemistry Staining Reproducibility.
    Chlipala EA; Bendzinski CM; Dorner C; Sartan R; Copeland K; Pearce R; Doherty F; Bolon B
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2020 Jul; 28(6):428-436. PubMed ID: 31082827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital immunohistochemistry platform for the staining variation monitoring based on integration of image and statistical analyses with laboratory information system.
    Laurinaviciene A; Plancoulaine B; Baltrusaityte I; Meskauskas R; Besusparis J; Lesciute-Krilaviciene D; Raudeliunas D; Iqbal Y; Herlin P; Laurinavicius A
    Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S10. PubMed ID: 25565007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of protein expression in cells and cellular subcompartments on immunohistochemical sections using a computer supported image analysis system.
    Braun M; Kirsten R; Rupp NJ; Moch H; Fend F; Wernert N; Kristiansen G; Perner S
    Histol Histopathol; 2013 May; 28(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 23361561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IHC Profiler: an open source plugin for the quantitative evaluation and automated scoring of immunohistochemistry images of human tissue samples.
    Varghese F; Bukhari AB; Malhotra R; De A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96801. PubMed ID: 24802416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical note on the validation of a semi-automated image analysis software application for estrogen and progesterone receptor detection in breast cancer.
    Krecsák L; Micsik T; Kiszler G; Krenács T; Szabó D; Jónás V; Császár G; Czuni L; Gurzó P; Ficsor L; Molnár B
    Diagn Pathol; 2011 Jan; 6():6. PubMed ID: 21244664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deep learning-based image analysis methods for brightfield-acquired multiplex immunohistochemistry images.
    Fassler DJ; Abousamra S; Gupta R; Chen C; Zhao M; Paredes D; Batool SA; Knudsen BS; Escobar-Hoyos L; Shroyer KR; Samaras D; Kurc T; Saltz J
    Diagn Pathol; 2020 Jul; 15(1):100. PubMed ID: 32723384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing computer-generated and pathologist-generated tumour segmentations for immunohistochemical scoring of breast tissue microarrays.
    Akbar S; Jordan LB; Purdie CA; Thompson AM; McKenna SJ
    Br J Cancer; 2015 Sep; 113(7):1075-80. PubMed ID: 26348443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immunohistochemical assessment of HER2 low breast cancer: interobserver reproducibility and correlation with digital image analysis.
    Sun H; Kang EY; Chen H; Sweeney KJ; Suchko M; Wu Y; Wen J; Krishnamurthy S; Albarracin CT; Ding QQ; Foo WC; Sahin AA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Jun; 205(2):403-411. PubMed ID: 38441847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a multiplex immuno-oncology biomarker and digital pathology workflow for assessment of urothelial carcinoma.
    Xie Y; Olkhov-Mitsel E; Alminawi S; Slodkowska E; Downes MR
    Pathol Res Pract; 2021 Oct; 226():153607. PubMed ID: 34509050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analytical validation of quantitative immunohistochemical assays of tumor infiltrating lymphocyte biomarkers.
    Singh U; Cui Y; Dimaano N; Mehta S; Pruitt SK; Yearley J; Laterza OF; Juco JW; Dogdas B
    Biotech Histochem; 2018; 93(6):411-423. PubMed ID: 29863904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading immunohistochemical slides on a computer monitor--a multisite performance study using 180 HER2-stained breast carcinomas.
    Nassar A; Cohen C; Albitar M; Agersborg SS; Zhou W; Lynch KA; Heyman ER; Lange H; Siddiqui MT
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2011 May; 19(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 21475038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated quantitative analysis of Ki-67 staining and HE images recognition and registration based on whole tissue sections in breast carcinoma.
    Feng M; Deng Y; Yang L; Jing Q; Zhang Z; Xu L; Wei X; Zhou Y; Wu D; Xiang F; Wang Y; Bao J; Bu H
    Diagn Pathol; 2020 May; 15(1):65. PubMed ID: 32471471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of tissue decalcification on the quantification of breast cancer biomarkers by digital image analysis.
    Gertych A; Mohan S; Maclary S; Mohanty S; Wawrowsky K; Mirocha J; Balzer B; Knudsen BS
    Diagn Pathol; 2014 Nov; 9():213. PubMed ID: 25421113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis.
    Chlipala EA; Butters M; Brous M; Fortin JS; Archuletta R; Copeland K; Bolon B
    Toxicol Pathol; 2021 Jun; 49(4):755-772. PubMed ID: 33251977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AutoIHC-Analyzer: computer-assisted microscopy for automated membrane extraction/scoring in HER2 molecular markers.
    Tewary S; Arun I; Ahmed R; Chatterjee S; Mukhopadhyay S
    J Microsc; 2021 Jan; 281(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 32803890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.