These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22515638)
1. Baseline comparison of three health utility measures and the feeling thermometer among participants in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial. Raisch DW; Feeney P; Goff DC; Narayan KM; O'Connor PJ; Zhang P; Hire DG; Sullivan MD Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2012 Jul; 11():35. PubMed ID: 22515638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing short form 6D, standard gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: results from total hip arthroplasty patients. Feeny D; Wu L; Eng K Qual Life Res; 2004 Dec; 13(10):1659-70. PubMed ID: 15651537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of intensive lifestyle intervention on preference-based quality of life in type 2 diabetes: Results from the Look AHEAD trial. Zhang P; Hire D; Espeland MA; Knowler WC; Thomas S; Tsai AG; Glick HA; Obesity (Silver Spring); 2016 Apr; 24(4):856-64. PubMed ID: 27028282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A view from the bridge: agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index. O'Brien BJ; Spath M; Blackhouse G; Severens JL; Dorian P; Brazier J Health Econ; 2003 Nov; 12(11):975-81. PubMed ID: 14601159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A review of the psychometric properties of generic utility measures in multiple sclerosis. Kuspinar A; Mayo NE Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Aug; 32(8):759-73. PubMed ID: 24846760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing directly measured standard gamble scores to HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores: group- and individual-level comparisons. Feeny D; Furlong W; Saigal S; Sun J Soc Sci Med; 2004 Feb; 58(4):799-809. PubMed ID: 14672594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of preference-based utilities of the Short-Form 36 Health Survey and Health Utilities Index before and after treatment of patients with intermittent claudication. Bosch JL; Halpern EF; Gazelle GS Med Decis Making; 2002; 22(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 12365482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discordance in Utility Measurement in Persons with Neurological Conditions: A Comparison of the SF-6D and the HUI3. Abel H; Kephart G; Packer T; Warner G Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1157-1165. PubMed ID: 28964449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the health utilities indices Mark 2 and Mark 3 in type 2 diabetes. Maddigan SL; Feeny DH; Johnson JA; Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(6):489-501. PubMed ID: 14672109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Construct validity for the Health Utilities Index in a sleep center. Welch KC; Scharf SM Sleep Breath; 2007 Dec; 11(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 17457630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke. Pickard AS; Johnson JA; Feeny DH Qual Life Res; 2005 Feb; 14(1):207-19. PubMed ID: 15789955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores in Alzheimer's disease. Neumann PJ; Sandberg EA; Araki SS; Kuntz KM; Feeny D; Weinstein MC Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):413-22. PubMed ID: 11059474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do generic utility measures capture what is important to the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis? Kuspinar A; Mayo NE Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2013 Apr; 11():71. PubMed ID: 23618072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of the health utilities index mark 3 and the short form 6D: evidence from an individual participant data meta-analysis of very preterm and very low birthweight adults. Bolbocean C; Anderson PJ; Bartmann P; Cheong JLY; Doyle LW; Wolke D; Petrou S Qual Life Res; 2023 Jun; 32(6):1703-1716. PubMed ID: 36705795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Marra CA; Woolcott JC; Kopec JA; Shojania K; Offer R; Brazier JE; Esdaile JM; Anis AH Soc Sci Med; 2005 Apr; 60(7):1571-82. PubMed ID: 15652688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence on the construct validity of the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 in patients with chronic kidney disease. Davison SN; Jhangri GS; Feeny DH Qual Life Res; 2008 Aug; 17(6):933-42. PubMed ID: 18543076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health Condition Impacts in a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey Vary Substantially by Preference-Based Health Index. Hanmer J; Cherepanov D; Palta M; Kaplan RM; Feeny D; Fryback DG Med Decis Making; 2016 Feb; 36(2):264-74. PubMed ID: 26314728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints. Grutters JP; Joore MA; van der Horst F; Verschuure H; Dreschler WA; Anteunis LJ Qual Life Res; 2007 Oct; 16(8):1439-49. PubMed ID: 17647093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) with the Short Form-36 preference-based SF-6D in chronic kidney disease. Davison SN; Jhangri GS; Feeny DH Value Health; 2009; 12(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 18657096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A parent-child dyad approach to the assessment of health status and health-related quality of life in children with asthma. Ungar WJ; Boydell K; Dell S; Feldman BM; Marshall D; Willan A; Wright JG Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Aug; 30(8):697-712. PubMed ID: 22788260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]