These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22515770)

  • 21. Pilot study of a 'RIME'-based tool for giving feedback in a multi-specialty longitudinal clerkship.
    DeWitt D; Carline J; Paauw D; Pangaro L
    Med Educ; 2008 Dec; 42(12):1205-9. PubMed ID: 19120951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Examination results of medical students with dyslexia.
    McKendree J; Snowling MJ
    Med Educ; 2011 Feb; 45(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 21208263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What is the evidence that utilizing the GALS assessment while teaching medical students improves their skills at examining the musculoskeletal system?
    Lee MA
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2010 Sep; 49(9):1783-4. PubMed ID: 20439319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can STEEM be used to measure the educational environment within the operating theatre for undergraduate medical students?
    Nagraj S; Wall D; Jones E
    Med Teach; 2006 Nov; 28(7):642-7. PubMed ID: 17594557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improving the accuracy of self-assessment of practical clinical skills using video feedback--the importance of including benchmarks.
    Hawkins SC; Osborne A; Schofield SJ; Pournaras DJ; Chester JF
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 22455696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Avoiding tokenism in health professional education.
    Bearman M; Ajjawi R
    Med Educ; 2013 Jan; 47(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 23278817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Professionalism Mini-Evaluation Exercise for medical residents in Japan: a pilot study.
    Tsugawa Y; Tokuda Y; Ohbu S; Okubo T; Cruess R; Cruess S; Ohde S; Okada S; Hayashida N; Fukui T
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):968-78. PubMed ID: 19769646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students.
    Lurie SJ; Nofziger AC; Meldrum S; Mooney C; Epstein RM
    Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 40(11):1088-97. PubMed ID: 17054618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of risk communication by objective structured clinical examination.
    Joekes K; Sedgwick P; Hall A
    Med Educ; 2009 May; 43(5):484. PubMed ID: 19344344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Realising the potential value of feedback.
    Hauer KE; Kogan JR
    Med Educ; 2012 Feb; 46(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 22239327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Student peer evaluation using a remote response system.
    Nájera A; Villalba JM; Arribas E
    Med Educ; 2010 Nov; 44(11):1146. PubMed ID: 20946511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The interactive examination: assessing students' self-assessment ability.
    Mattheos N; Nattestad A; Falk-Nilsson E; Attström R
    Med Educ; 2004 Apr; 38(4):378-89. PubMed ID: 15025639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Feedback sandwiches affect perceptions but not performance.
    Parkes J; Abercrombie S; McCarty T
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Aug; 18(3):397-407. PubMed ID: 22581568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How to pass an objective structured clinical examination.
    Zaidi F
    Pract Midwife; 2009; 12(7):36-40. PubMed ID: 19653392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Peer assessment platform of clinical skills in undergraduate medical education.
    Chen L; Chen H; Xu D; Yang Y; Li H; Hua D
    J Int Med Res; 2019 Nov; 47(11):5526-5535. PubMed ID: 31530204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31.
    Norcini J; Burch V
    Med Teach; 2007 Nov; 29(9):855-71. PubMed ID: 18158655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. To the point: reviews in medical education--the Objective Structured Clinical Examination.
    Casey PM; Goepfert AR; Espey EL; Hammoud MM; Kaczmarczyk JM; Katz NT; Neutens JJ; Nuthalapaty FS; Peskin E;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 200(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 19121656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adopting programmatic feedback to enhance the learning of complex skills.
    Yusoff MS; Hadie SN; Abdul Rahim AF
    Med Educ; 2014 Feb; 48(2):108-10. PubMed ID: 24528391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. LUCAS: a theoretically informed instrument to assess clinical communication in objective structured clinical examinations.
    Huntley CD; Salmon P; Fisher PL; Fletcher I; Young B
    Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 22324526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using a structured clinical coaching program to improve clinical skills training and assessment, as well as teachers' and students' satisfaction.
    Régo P; Peterson R; Callaway L; Ward M; O'Brien C; Donald K
    Med Teach; 2009 Dec; 31(12):e586-95. PubMed ID: 19995160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.