These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22515948)

  • 41. Reaction time reduction after parafoveal preview in a lexical decision task.
    Grieco A; Beretta G; Casco C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Aug; 103(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17037638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Parafoveal processing of word n + 2 during reading: do the preceding words matter?
    Angele B; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1210-20. PubMed ID: 21553996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading.
    Inhoff AW; Radach R; Eiter BM; Juhasz B
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jul; 56(5):803-27. PubMed ID: 12850988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Word skipping during sentence reading: effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing.
    Choi W; Gordon PC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):201-13. PubMed ID: 24170376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading.
    Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):544-55. PubMed ID: 2527961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Phonological codes are assembled before word fixation: evidence from boundary paradigm in sentence reading.
    Miellet S; Sparrow L
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):299-310. PubMed ID: 15172547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The frequency-predictability interaction in reading: it depends where you're coming from.
    Hand CJ; Miellet S; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1294-313. PubMed ID: 20854004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Out of the corner of my eye: Foveal semantic load modulates parafoveal processing in reading.
    Payne BR; Stites MC; Federmeier KD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1839-1857. PubMed ID: 27428778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A co-registration investigation of inter-word spacing and parafoveal preview: Eye movements and fixation-related potentials.
    Degno F; Loberg O; Zang C; Zhang M; Donnelly N; Liversedge SP
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225819. PubMed ID: 31851679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level?
    Snell J; Vitu F; Grainger J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1984-1996. PubMed ID: 27457807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition.
    Kennedy A; Pynte J; Ducrot S
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Oct; 55(4):1307-37. PubMed ID: 12420997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Lexical integration across saccades in reading.
    Inhoff AW; Tousman S
    Psychol Res; 1990; 52(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 2287696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Parafoveal degradation during reading reduces preview costs only when it is not perceptually distinct.
    Vasilev MR; Yates M; Prueitt E; Slattery TJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Feb; 74(2):254-276. PubMed ID: 32988313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Is emotional content obtained from parafoveal words during reading? An eye movement analysis.
    Hyönä J; Häikiö T
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Dec; 46(6):475-83. PubMed ID: 16277648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Forced fixations, trans-saccadic integration, and word recognition: Evidence for a hybrid mechanism of saccade triggering in reading.
    Schotter ER; von der Malsburg T; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):677-688. PubMed ID: 29999398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2.
    Kliegl R; Risse S; Laubrock J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1250-5. PubMed ID: 17924820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
    Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects of emotional word semantics in reading Chinese sentences: evidence from eye movements.
    Yan M; Sommer W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1237-43. PubMed ID: 25581226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Stable preview difficulty effects in reading with an improved variant of the boundary paradigm.
    Risse S; Seelig S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1632-1645. PubMed ID: 30501560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.