247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22516510)
1. Is chromosome testing of the second miscarriage cost saving? A decision analysis of selective versus universal recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation.
Bernardi LA; Plunkett BA; Stephenson MD
Fertil Steril; 2012 Jul; 98(1):156-61. PubMed ID: 22516510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of cytogenetic evaluation of products of conception in the patient with a second pregnancy loss.
Foyouzi N; Cedars MI; Huddleston HG
Fertil Steril; 2012 Jul; 98(1):151-5. PubMed ID: 22748232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients.
Popescu F; Jaslow CR; Kutteh WH
Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):579-587. PubMed ID: 29538673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of preimplantation genetic screening and in vitro fertilization versus expectant management in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
Murugappan G; Ohno MS; Lathi RB
Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):1215-20. PubMed ID: 25772770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Information-rich" reproductive outcomes in carriers of a structural chromosome rearrangement ascertained on the basis of recurrent pregnancy loss.
Desjardins MK; Stephenson MD
Fertil Steril; 2012 Apr; 97(4):894-903. PubMed ID: 22325687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of infertility, maternal age, and number of previous miscarriages on the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss.
Garrisi JG; Colls P; Ferry KM; Zheng X; Garrisi MG; Munné S
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul; 92(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 18692844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic analysis of chromosome testing in couples with recurrent miscarriage to prevent handicapped offspring.
van Leeuwen M; Vansenne F; Korevaar JC; van der Veen F; Goddijn M; Mol BW
Hum Reprod; 2013 Jul; 28(7):1737-42. PubMed ID: 23613277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of cytogenetic evaluation of products of conception by chorionic villus sampling in recurrent miscarriage.
Petracchi F; Paez C; Igarzabal L
Prenat Diagn; 2017 Mar; 37(3):282-288. PubMed ID: 28067420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Paternal and maternal carriage of the annexin A5 M2 haplotype are equal risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: a pilot study.
Rogenhofer N; Engels L; Bogdanova N; Tüttelmann F; Markoff A; Thaler C
Fertil Steril; 2012 Aug; 98(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 22624674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Y-chromosome microdeletions and recurrent pregnancy loss.
Dewan S; Puscheck EE; Coulam CB; Wilcox AJ; Jeyendran RS
Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):441-5. PubMed ID: 16595224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Embryo selection with preimplantation chromosomal screening in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Shahine LK; Lathi RB
Semin Reprod Med; 2014 Mar; 32(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 24515903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetics of recurrent pregnancy loss.
Sierra S; Stephenson M
Semin Reprod Med; 2006 Feb; 24(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 16418974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factor V Leiden mutation: a treatable etiology for sporadic and recurrent pregnancy loss.
Glueck CJ; Gogenini S; Munjal J; Tracy T; Pranikoff J; Wang P
Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):410-6. PubMed ID: 17582408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Miscarriage chromosome testing: utility of comparative genomic hybridization with reflex microsatellite analysis in preserved miscarriage tissue.
Mathur N; Triplett L; Stephenson MD
Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1349-52. PubMed ID: 24636399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Selective karyotyping in repeated miscarriage].
Nelen WL; Braat DD
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Apr; 151(15):848-9. PubMed ID: 17472113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequency of euploid miscarriage is increased in obese women with recurrent early pregnancy loss.
Boots CE; Bernardi LA; Stephenson MD
Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):455-9. PubMed ID: 24907916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new algorithm for the evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss redefining unexplained miscarriage: review of current guidelines.
Papas RS; Kutteh WH
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 32(5):371-379. PubMed ID: 32590384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a parental carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement.
Stephenson MD; Sierra S
Hum Reprod; 2006 Apr; 21(4):1076-82. PubMed ID: 16396938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a parental carrier of chromosome abnormalities or polymorphisms.
Dong Y; Li LL; Wang RX; Yu XW; Yun X; Liu RZ
Genet Mol Res; 2014 Jan; 13(2):2849-56. PubMed ID: 24535899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low uptake of prenatal diagnosis after established carrier status of a balanced structural chromosome abnormality in couples with recurrent miscarriage.
Vansenne F; de Borgie CA; Korevaar JC; Franssen MT; Pajkrt E; Hansson KB; Leschot NJ; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F; Goddijn M
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jun; 94(1):296-300.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19328468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
