281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22517270)
1. Joint latent class models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: a review.
Proust-Lima C; Séne M; Taylor JM; Jacqmin-Gadda H
Stat Methods Med Res; 2014 Feb; 23(1):74-90. PubMed ID: 22517270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and validation of a dynamic prognostic tool for prostate cancer recurrence using repeated measures of posttreatment PSA: a joint modeling approach.
Proust-Lima C; Taylor JM
Biostatistics; 2009 Jul; 10(3):535-49. PubMed ID: 19369642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Joint models for dynamic prediction in localised prostate cancer: a literature review.
Parr H; Hall E; Porta N
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):245. PubMed ID: 36123621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Joint modeling of repeated multivariate cognitive measures and competing risks of dementia and death: a latent process and latent class approach.
Proust-Lima C; Dartigues JF; Jacqmin-Gadda H
Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(3):382-98. PubMed ID: 26376900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Score test for conditional independence between longitudinal outcome and time to event given the classes in the joint latent class model.
Jacqmin-Gadda H; Proust-Lima C; Taylor JM; Commenges D
Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 19432771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Joint modelling of longitudinal and multi-state processes: application to clinical progressions in prostate cancer.
Ferrer L; Rondeau V; Dignam J; Pickles T; Jacqmin-Gadda H; Proust-Lima C
Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(22):3933-48. PubMed ID: 27090611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting time to prostate cancer recurrence based on joint models for non-linear longitudinal biomarkers and event time outcomes.
Pauler DK; Finkelstein DM
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3897-911. PubMed ID: 12483774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Joint latent class trees: A tree-based approach to modeling time-to-event and longitudinal data.
Zhang N; Simonoff JS
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Apr; 31(4):719-752. PubMed ID: 35179059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-time individual predictions of prostate cancer recurrence using joint models.
Taylor JM; Park Y; Ankerst DP; Proust-Lima C; Williams S; Kestin L; Bae K; Pickles T; Sandler H
Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):206-13. PubMed ID: 23379600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A copula-based approach for dynamic prediction of survival with a binary time-dependent covariate.
Suresh K; Taylor JMG; Tsodikov A
Stat Med; 2021 Oct; 40(23):4931-4946. PubMed ID: 34124771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between prostate-specific antigen, alkaline phosphatase levels, and time-to-tumor shrinkage: understanding the progression of prostate cancer in a longitudinal study.
Liaqat M; Khan RA; Fischer F; Kamal S
BMC Urol; 2024 Jul; 24(1):137. PubMed ID: 38956570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Choice of prognostic estimators in joint models by estimating differences of expected conditional Kullback-Leibler risks.
Commenges D; Liquet B; Proust-Lima C
Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):380-7. PubMed ID: 22578147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Joint longitudinal and time-to-event cure models for the assessment of being cured.
Barbieri A; Legrand C
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1256-1270. PubMed ID: 31213153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A latent class mixed model for analysing biomarker trajectories with irregularly scheduled observations.
Lin H; McCulloch CE; Turnbull BW; Slate EH; Clark LC
Stat Med; 2000 May; 19(10):1303-18. PubMed ID: 10814979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regularized Latent Class Model for Joint Analysis of High-Dimensional Longitudinal Biomarkers and a Time-to-Event Outcome.
Sun J; Herazo-Maya JD; Molyneaux PL; Maher TM; Kaminski N; Zhao H
Biometrics; 2019 Mar; 75(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 30178494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Individualized dynamic prediction of prostate cancer recurrence with and without the initiation of a second treatment: Development and validation.
Sène M; Taylor JM; Dignam JJ; Jacqmin-Gadda H; Proust-Lima C
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2972-2991. PubMed ID: 24847900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A dynamic trajectory class model for intensive longitudinal categorical outcome.
Lin H; Han L; Peduzzi PN; Murphy TE; Gill TM; Allore HG
Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(15):2645-64. PubMed ID: 24519416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantifying and comparing dynamic predictive accuracy of joint models for longitudinal marker and time-to-event in presence of censoring and competing risks.
Blanche P; Proust-Lima C; Loubère L; Berr C; Dartigues JF; Jacqmin-Gadda H
Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):102-113. PubMed ID: 25311240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Joint modelling of longitudinal measurements and survival times via a multivariate copula approach.
Zhang Z; Charalambous C; Foster P
J Appl Stat; 2023; 50(13):2739-2759. PubMed ID: 37720246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A nonlinear latent class model for joint analysis of multivariate longitudinal data and a binary outcome.
Proust-Lima C; Letenneur L; Jacqmin-Gadda H
Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(10):2229-45. PubMed ID: 16900568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
