154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22517664)
1. Investigating attribute non-attendance and its consequences in choice experiments with latent class models.
Lagarde M
Health Econ; 2013 May; 22(5):554-67. PubMed ID: 22517664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discrete choice analysis of health worker job preferences in Ethiopia: Separating attribute non-attendance from taste heterogeneity.
Arora N; Quaife M; Hanson K; Lagarde M; Woldesenbet D; Seifu A; Crastes Dit Sourd R
Health Econ; 2022 May; 31(5):806-819. PubMed ID: 35178825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision heuristic or preference? Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice problems.
Heidenreich S; Watson V; Ryan M; Phimister E
Health Econ; 2018 Jan; 27(1):157-171. PubMed ID: 28620975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Partial attribute attendance in environmental choice experiments: A comparative case study between Guangzhou (China) and Brussels (Belgium).
Hua J; Chen WY; Liekens I; Cho FHT
J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 285():112107. PubMed ID: 33561727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attribute nonattendance in COVID-19 vaccine choice: A discrete choice experiment based on Chinese public preference.
Xiao J; Wang F; Wang M; Ma Z
Health Expect; 2022 Jun; 25(3):959-970. PubMed ID: 35049117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating willingness-to-pay for health care: A discrete choice experiment accounting for non-attendance to the cost attribute.
Sever I; Verbič M; Sever EK
J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Oct; 25(5):843-849. PubMed ID: 30677196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A closer look at decision and analyst error by including nonlinearities in discrete choice models: implications on willingness-to-pay estimates derived from discrete choice data in healthcare.
de Bekker-Grob EW; Rose JM; Bliemer MC
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1169-83. PubMed ID: 24178372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are Efficient Designs Used in Discrete Choice Experiments Too Difficult for Some Respondents? A Case Study Eliciting Preferences for End-of-Life Care.
Flynn TN; Bilger M; Malhotra C; Finkelstein EA
Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Mar; 34(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 26589411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.
Clark MD; Determann D; Petrou S; Moro D; de Bekker-Grob EW
Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Sep; 32(9):883-902. PubMed ID: 25005924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mimicking Real-Life Decision Making in Health: Allowing Respondents Time to Think in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Veldwijk J; Johansson JV; Donkers B; de Bekker-Grob EW
Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):945-952. PubMed ID: 32762997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. To pay or not to pay? Cost information processing in the valuation of publicly funded healthcare.
Genie MG; Ryan M; Krucien N
Soc Sci Med; 2021 May; 276():113822. PubMed ID: 33752103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lost in the crowd? Using eye-tracking to investigate the effect of complexity on attribute non-attendance in discrete choice experiments.
Spinks J; Mortimer D
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Feb; 16():14. PubMed ID: 26842646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the inclusion of a cost attribute result in different preferences for the surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma?: a comparison of two discrete-choice experiments.
Essers BA; van Helvoort-Postulart D; Prins MH; Neumann M; Dirksen CD
Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(6):507-20. PubMed ID: 20387912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.
Wright SJ; Vass CM; Sim G; Burton M; Fiebig DG; Payne K
Patient; 2018 Oct; 11(5):475-488. PubMed ID: 29492903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data?
de Bekker-Grob EW; Donkers B; Bliemer MCJ; Veldwijk J; Swait JD
Soc Sci Med; 2020 Feb; 246():112736. PubMed ID: 31887626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Exploratory Application of Eye-Tracking Methods in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Vass C; Rigby D; Tate K; Stewart A; Payne K
Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):658-672. PubMed ID: 30074879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What Do Patients Want from Otolaryngologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment.
Naunheim MR; Rathi VK; Naunheim ML; Alkire BC; Lam AC; Song PC; Shrime MG
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Oct; 157(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 28675119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accounting for Attribute-Level Non-Attendance in a Health Choice Experiment: Does it Matter?
Erdem S; Campbell D; Hole AR
Health Econ; 2015 Jul; 24(7):773-89. PubMed ID: 24798402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]