142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22517998)
1. Patient discomfort in bitewing examination with film and four digital receptors.
Jørgensen PM; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 May; 41(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 22517998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient discomfort and cross-infection control in bitewing examination with a storage phosphor plate and a CCD-based sensor.
Wenzel A; Frandsen E; Hintze H
J Dent; 1999 Mar; 27(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 10079631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bitewing examination with four digital receptors.
Bahrami G; Hagstrøm C; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 14709607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current practice in conventional and digital intraoral radiography: problems and solutions.
Fuhrmann AW
Int J Comput Dent; 2006 Jan; 9(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 16608054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporomandibular joint pantomography using charge-coupled device, photostimulable phosphor, and film receptors: a comparison.
Farman TT; Farman AG
J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10342155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient discomfort and retakes in periapical examination of mandibular third molars using digital receptors and film.
Matzen LH; Christensen J; Wenzel A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):566-72. PubMed ID: 19121963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of older and newer versions of intraoral digital radiography systems: diagnosing noncavitated proximal carious lesions.
Haiter-Neto F; dos Anjos Pontual A; Frydenberg M; Wenzel A
J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Oct; 138(10):1353-9; quiz 1382-3. PubMed ID: 17908850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient comfort in periapical examination using digital receptors.
Gonçalves A; Wiezel VG; Gonçalves M; Hebling J; Sannomiya EK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):484-8. PubMed ID: 19767521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors.
Wenzel A; Møystad A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jul; 30(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 11681481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of scanography using storage phosphor plate systems and film for assessment of mandibular third molars.
Matzen LH; Christensen J; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Jul; 40(5):306-9. PubMed ID: 21697156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of artificial occlusal caries in a phosphor imaging plate system with two types of LCD monitors versus three different films.
Ilgüy M; Dinçer S; Ilgüy D; Bayirli G
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Jun; 22(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 18949518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does a combination of two radiographs increase accuracy in detecting acid-induced periapical lesions and does it approach the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography scanning?
Soğur E; Gröndahl HG; Baksı BG; Mert A
J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 22244624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.
Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl HG; Molander B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simulation of three intraoral radiographic techniques in pediatric dental patients: subjective comfort assessment using the VAS and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Raiting Scale.
Ozdemir S; Parlakyıldız Gokce A; Unver T
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):33. PubMed ID: 32005154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shall I go digital?
Thomas BL; Davies J; Whaites E
Dent Update; 2014 May; 41(4):314-6, 319-22, 325-6. PubMed ID: 24930253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Storage phosphor and film-screen mammography: performance with different mammographic techniques.
Kheddache S; Thilander-Klang A; Lanhede B; Månsson LG; Bjurstam N; Ackerholm P; Björneld L
Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(4):591-7. PubMed ID: 10354868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries.
Pontual AA; de Melo DP; de Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN; Haiter Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 20841461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
