These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22517998)

  • 21. Computed vs. film-based radiographs' contour artifacts influence diagnosis of secondary caries.
    Danz JC; Flück HP; Campus G; Wolf TG
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Sep; 166():111004. PubMed ID: 37556885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Comparative study on radio-opacity of dental composite resin materials'determination using film imaging and digital imaging].
    Li Y; Lin H; Zhang TJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 34650308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficacy of lead foil for reducing doses in the head and neck: a simulation study using digital intraoral systems.
    Nejaim Y; Silva AI; Brasil DM; Vasconcelos KF; Haiter Neto F; Boscolo FN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150065. PubMed ID: 26084474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of Efficiency and Image Quality of Photostimulable Phosphor Plate and Charge-Coupled Device Receptors in Dental Radiography.
    Zhang W; Huynh C; Jadhav A; Pinales J; Arvizu L; Tsai J; Flores N
    J Dent Educ; 2019 Oct; 83(10):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 31235501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 1: the influence of X-ray generator on periodontal measurements using conventional and digital receptors.
    Vandenberghe B; Corpas L; Bosmans H; Yang J; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):537-49. PubMed ID: 20443035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images.
    Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography.
    Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Yüksel S; Ozen T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):450-9. PubMed ID: 22868296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Noack MJ
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 11385199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Brown WP; Lewis J; Benefiel M; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10980561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of five radiographic systems to D-speed film in the detection of artificial bone lesions.
    Hadley DL; Replogle KJ; Kirkam JC; Best AM
    J Endod; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1111-4. PubMed ID: 18718376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the reproducibility of storage phosphor and film bitewings for assessment of alveolar bone loss.
    Henriksson CH; Stermer EM; Aass AM; Sandvik L; Møystad A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008; 66(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 18932094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An image plate system for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; Borg E; Tammisalo E
    Dent Update; 1996 Oct; 23(8):334-7. PubMed ID: 9452625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Storage phosphor radiography.
    Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M
    Eur Radiol; 1997; 7 Suppl 3():S58-65. PubMed ID: 9169103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.