These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22518113)

  • 1. Label fusion strategy selection.
    Robitaille N; Duchesne S
    Int J Biomed Imaging; 2012; 2012():431095. PubMed ID: 22518113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Whole-body bone segmentation from MRI for PET/MRI attenuation correction using shape-based averaging.
    Arabi H; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5848. PubMed ID: 27806602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shape-based averaging for combination of multiple segmentations.
    Rohlfing T; Maurer CR
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):838-45. PubMed ID: 16686038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. iSTAPLE: Improved Label Fusion for Segmentation by Combining STAPLE with Image Intensity.
    Liu X; Montillo A; Tan ET; Schenck JF
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2013 Feb; 8669():. PubMed ID: 31741552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shape-based averaging.
    Rohlfing T; Maurer CR
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2007 Jan; 16(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 17283774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hierarchical multi-atlas label fusion with multi-scale feature representation and label-specific patch partition.
    Wu G; Kim M; Sanroma G; Wang Q; Munsell BC; Shen D;
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():34-46. PubMed ID: 25463474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating a reference standard segmentation with spatially varying performance parameters: local MAP STAPLE.
    Commowick O; Akhondi-Asl A; Warfield SK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Aug; 31(8):1593-606. PubMed ID: 22562727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A robust discriminative multi-atlas label fusion method for hippocampus segmentation from MR image.
    Wang W; Zhang X; Ma Y; Cui H; Xia R; Zhang Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106197. PubMed ID: 34102562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiatlas-Based Segmentation Editing With Interaction-Guided Patch Selection and Label Fusion.
    Park SH; Gao Y; Shen D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Jun; 63(6):1208-1219. PubMed ID: 26485353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manual-Protocol Inspired Technique for Improving Automated MR Image Segmentation during Label Fusion.
    Bhagwat N; Pipitone J; Winterburn JL; Guo T; Duerden EG; Voineskos AN; Lepage M; Miller SP; Pruessner JC; Chakravarty MM
    Front Neurosci; 2016; 10():325. PubMed ID: 27486386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates.
    Pipitone J; Park MT; Winterburn J; Lett TA; Lerch JP; Pruessner JC; Lepage M; Voineskos AN; Chakravarty MM;
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():494-512. PubMed ID: 24784800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic multiatlas selection-based consensus segmentation of head and neck structures from CT images.
    Haq R; Berry SL; Deasy JO; Hunt M; Veeraraghavan H
    Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5612-5622. PubMed ID: 31587300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-atlas Based Segmentation Editing with Interaction-Guided Constraints.
    Park SH; Gao Y; Shen D
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2015 Oct; 9351():198-206. PubMed ID: 26942234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Towards accurate, automatic segmentation of the hippocampus and amygdala from MRI.
    Collins DL; Pruessner JC
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 2):592-600. PubMed ID: 20426160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiatlas whole heart segmentation of CT data using conditional entropy for atlas ranking and selection.
    Zhuang X; Bai W; Song J; Zhan S; Qian X; Shi W; Lian Y; Rueckert D
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3822-33. PubMed ID: 26133584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A label fusion method using conditional random fields with higher-order potentials: Application to hippocampal segmentation.
    Platero C; Carmen Tobar M
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Jun; 64(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 25982908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-atlas and label fusion approach for patient-specific MRI based skull estimation.
    Torrado-Carvajal A; Herraiz JL; Hernandez-Tamames JA; San Jose-Estepar R; Eryaman Y; Rozenholc Y; Adalsteinsson E; Wald LL; Malpica N
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Apr; 75(4):1797-807. PubMed ID: 25981161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards accurate, automatic segmentation of the hippocampus and amygdala from MRI by augmenting ANIMAL with a template library and label fusion.
    Collins DL; Pruessner JC
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1355-66. PubMed ID: 20441794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-local statistical label fusion for multi-atlas segmentation.
    Asman AJ; Landman BA
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Feb; 17(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 23265798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Label fusion in atlas-based segmentation using a selective and iterative method for performance level estimation (SIMPLE).
    Langerak TR; van der Heide UA; Kotte AN; Viergever MA; van Vulpen M; Pluim JP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Dec; 29(12):2000-8. PubMed ID: 20667809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.